Link:.....Back.....Contents.....Next

1.4. New calculations of channel time price regardless of any space-time theory

But one channel time price DT we can calculate irrespective of any space-time theory, using two time-of-flight spectrums, obtained in the experiments with the same current of analysing magnet, but with different measuring bases.

Indeed, for particles of the same type we can write down

B₁ /u_j - t_delay = (n_1j - 1) ·DT_j, (1.24)

B₂ /u_j - t_delay = (n_2j - 1) ·DT_j,  (1.25)

where u_j is medial speed of a particle of j type; n_1j is the median of spectrum of the same j type particles at measuring base of B₁; n_2j is the median of spectrum of the same j type particles at measuring base of B₂; DT_j is channel time price calculated using spectrums of particles of j type.

It is well known that medial speed of particles of any type (electrons, muons, p -mesons), flying through scintillators 2 and 3 (see fig. 1.1) depends upon current value of analysing magnet power supply and does not depend upon measuring base length. Therefore, having solved equations (1.24) and (1.25) with respect to speed u and having equated the obtained expressions, we have the equation

B₁ / [(n_1j - 1) ·DT_j + t_delay] = B₂ /[(n_2j - 1) ·DT_j + t_delay], (1.26)

After solving equation (1.26) with respect to DT_j we shall obtain equation for calculation of time price of one analyser channel, irrespective of any space-time theory

DT_j = (B₂ - B₁)·t_delay / [B₁·(n_2j - 1) - B₂·(n_1j - 1) ]. (1.27)

Using equation (1.27) it is possible to calculate three values of one channel price:

а) DT_e - channel price calculated using electrons spectrum shift ( j = e);

б) DT_m - channel price calculated using muons spectrum shift ( j =m);

в) DT_p - channel price calculated using p -mesons spectrum shift ( j = p).

Using these three obtained values it is possible to calculate the average value of time price of one analyser channel for each meaning of analyser magnet current

DT  = (DT_e + DT_m + DT_p) / 3. (1.28)

Substituting into equation (1.27) data from table 1.1 and table 1.2, we have

DT_e ^485A = 0.5 10^-8 / [6 (252 - 1) - 6.5 (52 - 1)] =4.26 10^-12 s,

DT_m ^485A = 0.5 10^-8 / [6 (340 - 1) - 6.5 (128 - 1)] =4.14 10^-12 s,

DT_p^485A = 0.5 10^-8 / [6 (390 - 1) - 6.5 (178 - 1)] =4.22 10^-12 s,

DT_e ^550A = 0.37 10^-8 / [5.63 (132 - 1) - 6 (38 - 1)] =7.18 10^-12 s,

DT_m ^550A = 0.37 10^-8 / [5.63 (196 - 1) - 6 (97 - 1)] =7.09 10^-12 s,

DT_p ^550A = 0.37 10^-8 / [5.63 (227 - 1) - 6 (123 - 1)] =6.85 10^-12 s.

 Having substituted these data into equation (1.28), we have

DT ^485A  = 4.21 10^-12 seconds, (1.29)

DT ^550A  = 7.04 10^-12 seconds. (1.30)

1.5. Calculation of particles speed regardless of any space-time theory

Substituting into equation (1.15) the obtained values of analyser channel time price from (1.29), (1.30) and data from table 1.1 and table 1.2 we have

u_m^485A/c_o = 0.5 / [(340 - 128) · 4.21· 10^-12 ·3 ·10⁸] = 1.87 ,

These calculations show that each particle from spectrums shown in [7] and [8] moves at superlight speed either at analyser magnet current of 485 A, or at analyser magnet current of 550 A.

Besides, it is worthy to attract reader's attention to expressions (1.18) and (1.19). From physics it follows that at higher current of analysing magnet the equipment must detect particles with higher speed. But measured speed according to expression (1.19) (equal to 0.9038) at analysing magnet current of 550 А is less than measured speed according to expression (1.18) (equal to 0.9434) at analysing magnet current of 485 А. Taking into account that value from expression (1.18) (equal to 0.9434) differs from value from expression (1.21) (equal to 0.9390) less than on 1%, as well as the value from expression (1.19) (equal to 0.9038) differs from value from expression (1.20) (equal to 0.9099) also less than on 1%, it is possible to suppose that authors of experiment [7], [8] intentionally or involuntarily have falsified the result of their experiment in order to conform obtained results with Einstein's SRT. Speed of particles measured at analysing magnet current of 550 А they ascribed to experiment with analysing magnet current of 485 А, and speed of particles measured at analysing magnet current of 485 А, they ascribed to experiment with analysing magnet current of 550 А.

So, the above consideration shows clearly that superlight speeds of ordinary particles (high-energy electrons, muons etc.) are not detected in experiment [7] and [8] only because of assumption that high-energy electrons move at a speed not exceeding the speed of light in vacuum. But if a new and irrespective of any space-time theory method is used for equipment time scale calibration than it becomes obvious that high-energy particles move at a speed exceeding the speed of light in vacuum.