|
Link: Back Contents Next
Introduction
Now the special relativity theory (SRT) created by Lorentz [1],
Poincare [2], Einstein [3] and Minkovsky [4] (translations of articles [1]... [4] are
available in [5]), again occupies among the scientific theories a special position - it
became the last scientific theory of space and time recognised by the majority of people.
Up to quite a recent time the general theory of relativity (GRT) was considered as last
scientific space - time theory. But as A. A. Logunov has shown in the book [6], the
special theory of relativity is valid not only for inertial reference frames, but also for
non-inertial reference frames. Therefore the expansion of the SRT validity field on
non-inertial reference frames has returned the status of the last scientific space - time
theory to the special theory of relativity. And this means, that the forefront of
examinations purposing further development of our most fundamental notions about space and
time has already moved from the general theory of relativity to the special theory of
relativity.
The basis of the SRT is formed by the so-called Lorentz transformations
x' =(x - V t) (1 - V2/co2)-1/2,
y' = y, z' = z , t' = (t - Vx/co2)
(1 - V2/co2)-1/2,
(I.1)
where x', y', z'
and x, y, z are spatial coordinates of the same event in two various inertial
reference frames - primed and not primed; t' and t are time coordinates of the same event in two various
inertial reference frames; V is the speed of motion of one inertial
reference frame with respect to another one; сo =
299792458 m/s is the speed of light in vacuum, and all symbols in formula
(I.1) represent the so-called physical quantities, each of which is defined by a formula
a = ma ea , (I.2)
where a is a
physical quantity; ea is a
unit of measurements of the physical quantity a; ma is a dimensionless number showing how many units ea should be taken in order to obtain the measured physical
quantity a.
So, in any space - time theory the basic notions are:
- "physical quantity";
- "coordinates of an event " - position in space of that
point, in which the event occurs;
- "time of an event " - time coordinate of an event;
- "reference frame" - a coordinate system and plurality of
clocks being at rest in that coordinate system and being synchronised with each
other;
- method of synchronisation of clocks being at rest in some reference
frame;
- "transformations" of coordinates and time of an event from
one frame of reference to another one.
Among all these concepts the most mysterious is the concept " time
of an event ".
In article [[3]. Einstein A. Zur
Electrodynamik bewegten Korper // Annalen der Physik. - 1905. - B., 17. - s. 891 – 921]
for the concept "time of an event " it is possible to find such definition in
German:
"Die "Zeit" eines Ereignisses ist die mit dem Ereignis
gleichzeitige Angabe einer am Orte des Ereignisses befindlichen, ruhenden Uhr, welche mit
einer bestimmen, ruhenden Uhr, und zwar fur alle Zeitbestimmungen mit der namlichen Uhr,
synchron lauft".
In English this definition will have the following wording:
"The "time" of any event is simultaneous with the event
indication of a clock, which is at rest in a place of the event and which goes in
synchronism with some particular immovable clock, and with the same clock at all
determinations of time ".
The development of fundamental scientific theories, to which number the
space - time theory belongs also, occurs by overcoming contradictions appearing owing to
change of content of concepts under the influence of practical activity of mankind. The
successes of this activity in the field of electronics and mass manufacture of electronic
digit-showing clocks at the end of the ХХ century have resulted in understanding that
the clock indication simultaneous with any event can not be a physical quantity and
represents only a group of numerals.
Really, by photographing a clock indication at any moment of time we
can fix on a snapshot only a group of numerals, indicated by a clock. In order to
determine the time of an event by means of some clock, we at first will need to transform
a group of numerals indicated by a clock into dimensionless number, and then mentally
multiply this dimensionless number by duration of a unit of measurement of time in this
clock. With the best will in the world it is impossible to fix on a photographic snapshot
the duration of a time interval, which is a unit of measurements of time in this clock.
Under the "time of an event", which appears in many equations
of physics including Lorentz transformations (I.1) and which is designated more often by
symbol t, it was understood from time immemorial the
time interval between the time zero moment (for example, birth of Jesus Christ) and the
event being under consideration, the time interval equal to a product of dimensionless
number by duration of a unit of measurements of time, i. e..
t = mt et , t'
= mt' et' , (I.3)
where mt , mt'
are dimensionless numbers (indications of clocks); et
, et'
are
units of time measurements.
It is said, that the figures t and t', and also et
and et' , in expressions (I.3) designate
physical quantities (by definition a physical quantity represents the product of
dimensionless number by a unit of measurement of this physical quantity).
In the result of changes in the content of the notion "clock
indication" physical quantities are completely excluded from the notion "time of
an event ", defined as the indication, being simultaneous with an event, of a clock,
which is at rest in a place of event.
Then, what should we understand under symbols t
and t' in Lorentz
transformations? Should we consider these symbols as physical quantities like symbols in
expressions (I.3) or it is necessary to consider symbols t and t' in Lorentz transformations as dimensionless numbers?
It is obvious, that symbols t and t' in Lorentz transformations should be considered as
physical quantities. But, then, to what cofactor is it necessary to relate a relativistic
factor (1 - V2/co2)1/2
in the following formula, derived from Lorentz transformations
mt' et' = mt et
(1 - V2/co2)1/2 ,(I.4)
where сo is the speed of light in vacuum, V
is the speed of motion of one inertial reference frame with respect to another one?
If the relativistic factor is related to dimensionless number mt
, we shall have
mt' = mt (1-V2/co2)1/2
, et' = et . (I.5)
And if the relativistic factor is related to the time unit, we shall
have
mt' = mt
, et' = et (1-V2/co2)1/2.
(I.6)
It is said, that it would be more correct to consider that the formulas
(I.5) are valid. But if we shall consider the formulas (I.6) as valid formulas, than
Einstein's statement about delay of moving clock indications with respect to immovable
clock indications will be erroneous.
But if we consider the formulas (I.5) as the valid formulas, then how
can we explain that one time interval at transition from one inertial reference frame to
another one is calculated according to one formula (et' = et
), and the other time
interval is calculated according to completely different formula
Dt' = Dt (1-V2/co2)1/2?
(I.7)
The common sense prompts us that the relation between time measurement units et' and et should be precisely the same, as the
relation between physical quantities D t' and D t. But in the special theory of relativity it is not so. What is
to be done?
Certainly, it is possible to shame the common sense. But, on the other
hand, it is possible to try to find such transformations of coordinates and time, which
provide the same relation Dt' = F (D t ) and et'
= F (et ), whereF is the same function. Let's try to make it, having
previously changed the definition of the notion "time of an event" in such a way
that "time of an event" should become a physical quantity.
Let's introduce a new definition of the notion "time of an
event" as follows:
The "time" of an event is a duration of a time interval
between the time zero moment and the moment, at which the event has taken place, equal to
a product of indication, simultaneous with the event, of the clock (which at the zero time
moment had the zero indication) by a unit of time measurement in this clock.
The notion "indication of clock" included in this definition
corresponds to dimensionless number. And the "time of an event" appears to be
under such definition a physical quantity.
The problem of search for new transformations of coordinates and time
becomes even more urgent in connection with the fact, as it will be shown further in
section 1, that one of the basic statements of the special theory of relativity - the
statement about impossibility of superlight speeds of particles motion - appears to be
denied by an experiment.
Link: Back Contents Next
|