Russian version

Home page

Search:

For contact - E-mail


Articles and Publication
Articles and Publication    Physics    Theoretical physics INFORMATION-POWER RESONANT INTERACTION IN SUBSTANCE

 

INFORMATION-POWER RESONANT INTERACTION IN SUBSTANCE

© V.V. Barygin, Dr.Sc.

Contact to the author: valery.barygin@relicom.ru

 

A concept of technologies using Information-Power Resonant Interaction (IPRI – abbreviation from the English transcription) between material and non-material objects is developed in this work. A variant of experimental demonstration of the action of IPRI is suggested. There is also given an example of the use of IPRI in the technology of materials’ synthesis.

 _______________________________________________________________________________

KEY THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Introduction

Objects situated around us and observed by us (macroobjects) constitute a system of material particles connected by means of field interaction. It is well known that, possessing wave properties, a particle doesn’t have precise locality in space. Due to this fact information about a particle of substance is contained in any part of the Universe.

Further we shall base on a closed cosmological model of the Universe (hypersphere), in which a macroobject is a steady mass of standing waves of maximum concentration [1] (packet of amplitudes), realizing the property of “a hologram by itself”. In accordance with the hypothesis about the nonlocal property of macroobjects the latter, as well as isolated particles, stay in any point of space in a wave form concealed from the observer.

Interaction of macroobjects

In accordance with the hypothesis of quantum-wave image coding formulated by the famous Soviet psychologist V. N. Pushkin [2, page 33], formation of space properties of a macroobject upon perception can be considered as a process of origination of a certain system of standing waves with amplitude distribution corresponding to the displayed object’s curvature. This formation function is ensured by quantum-mechanical processes in cerebral cells and based upon the information received as a result of recent natural-science investigations [3].

The condition for macroobject initialization is the goal on the basis of which the macroobject “mental model” is developed.

This logic chain allows us to presume that all possible “mental models” already exist in space in a latent wave form (“information models”). In other words, everything that a man can imagine already exists. A similar “physico-theoretical criterion” was put forward by Soviet astrophysicist and philosopher G. I. Naan: “there exists everything that can be realized in accordance with the laws of nature”.

Let us illustrate this by an example of how a sculptor moulds his sculpture.

Let us suppose that the sculptor wishes to create the sculpture of a horse – this is the purpose.

He imagines the sculpture as the running horse.

The sculptor is thinking about his dream for a long time, as a result his brain, resonating with the “information model” of the horse, builds its own “mental model”. At some stage the sculptor decides to realize his “mental model” and begins to mould, realizing it by the way of physical forming of clay. Now there begins the similar process where the “mental model” of the horse (which has already been built by the sculptor) and the object being formed from clay are resonating. At this stage the goal is to achieve maximum correspondence (resonance) between the “mental model” and sculpture of the horse originating from the material substance (clay).

The clay horse obtained as a result of this process may, to a greater or lesser extent, satisfy the sculptor’s “mental model”, and to some extent correspond to the “information model” – a true image of a living horse.

Such process of formation and personification of a “mental model” must probably accompany any kind of creative human activity.

As it is obvious from the example, Information-Power Resonant Interaction (hereinafter referred to as IPRI) of models is the main mechanism of formation of a “mental model” or a material macroobject.

The idea of resonant informative control between various nerve centres within the system of intellectual self-regulation was developed by the famous Russian physiologist A. A. Ukhtomsky [4] and proved experimentally [5,6].

Let us consider the IPRI mechanism in more details in order to comprehend its true meaning.

Investigations of a scientist from Khabarovsk doctor Tszyan Kanchzhen, bringing out clearly not only the existence of the mechanism of informative resonant interaction, but its real action as well, are the most impressing. The essence of his theory is that vital activity and especially formation of a macroobject is accompanied by information interchange with the ambient space, which determines further development of the macroobject. To prove this idea there have been carried out experiments aimed at estimation of the influence of inductor bioinformation energetic field on the process of percipient formation. As a result of numerous experiments it is proved that the percipient perceives certain characteristics of the inductor that remain in further processes of percipient’s reproduction, and realizes them in the process of its own formation. Thus, there were bred chickens with the features of the duck, such as webbed feet helping them to swim, and webbed ears helping them to dive, as well as a hen covered with hair, a hybrid of corn with wheat and so on [7]. Information was transferred at superhigh frequencies. It was taken from the inductor by a system of horn antennas and transmitted to the percipient by waveguides.

The results of experiments carried out by doctor Tszyan prove the action of IPRI between macro substances within the frameworks of the hypothesis of quantum-wave image coding. Namely, spatial physical properties of a percipient were formed upon resonant adjustment of the percipient’s amplitude packet to the inductor’s amplitude packet carried out by a mechanical system “antenna – transmission line - oscillator”.

There are numerous facts known with regard to IPRI between macro substances from living and nonliving substance proved in many laboratories of the world [8, 9, 10]. These facts are interpreted as the appearance of such phenomenon as psychokinesis, i.e. mental influence of a man as an object of living matter upon surrounding objects.

Let us cite one of the experiments with a famous Soviet medium V. V. Ermolaev as an example. Among the scientists observing the experiment and recording the results there was the famous psychologist, professor, doctor of psychological sciences V. N. Pushkin, and biophysicist, doctor of biological sciences A. P. Dubrov. In the course of the experiment “hanging” of a matchbox in the airspace between the medium’s hands was fixed. The distance between the hands and the box was more than 5 centimeters. Preliminary concentration of the medium’s thoughts on the object and its “persuasion” is characteristic to this one and similar experiments. Experiments required great power inputs of the medium, nevertheless the probationer accentuated that the object’s quality and weight were not important for such demonstrations.

Let us consider the above mentioned example as a result of the action of IPRI between the medium and the object.

The initial process of concentration of the medium’s thoughts on the object and its “persuasion”, allow to suppose that it is nothing but the medium’s desire to build the “mental model” of the selected object as exactly as possible, and adjustment of IPRI between the “mental model” and the object. This is proved by the fact that the medium is capable of selective influence upon the neighboring objects, as well as that familiar objects are easier to “hang up”. When the medium manages to lay this “resonant bridge”, that becomes apparent from “sticking” of the object to palms, then, by transforming the “mental model” (but not the object itself), the medium is permitted to manipulate the object itself as well. That’s why the art of meditation, that is, mental concentration, is so important for yogis. The described process is reflected in the hypothesis of the psychologist V. N. Pushkin [2, page 31]: “… it is enough to ensure the necessary focusing in the given point of space that will allow the observer to reveal the wave structures of faraway objects hidden in each point”.

Let us consider one more extremely interesting phenomenon of medium’s dematerialization, teleportation and materialization of macroobjects from living and nonliving matter that was proved experimentally [11]. An objective control over everything happening was carried out with the help of modern electronics. Thus, for example [2, page 249], mechanical and electronic clock was shifted under the medium’s mental influence. At that, mechanical clock didn’t stop (the default time was 30 minutes 43 seconds), and electronic clock was 7,5 minutes slow, total duration of the experiment making up 9 minutes. After disappearance and transportation (11-73 minutes) insects (fruit-flies) had been alive for several days.

Let us determine the general scheme of this phenomenon using IPRI.

The first stage is concentrating the medium’s thought on the object for the purpose of formation of its “mental model”, and laying the “resonant bridge”.

The second stage is dematerialization.

To find an explanation of the phenomenon of dematerialization of the object we shall have to go deeper into the theory of matter consideration as a material substance, possessing weight as the measure of inertia in many-dimensional and stratificated substance [12], using such mathematical apparatus as discrete-continuous geometry [13]. The theory assumes that the mass can be positive, negative or even virtual, but it must be a quantum number characterizing any structural element of substance.

Not getting deeper into the above mentioned theories, let us only presume that as a result of teleportation process connected with certain subconscious work of human body, directed at fundamental code of the object’s substance, the same transforms into virtual state (dematerializes) and exists in nonmaterial state (the latent wave form) in one of subspaces (“information model”), conforming to the law of triunity.

The third stage is materialization. The medium concentrates all his attention on the place where the object should be shifted to, and realizes the “resonant bridge” between his “mental model” of the object and “information model” situated in the given place in the latent wave form. As a result the object “mental model” materializes its “information model”.

Of course the suggested scheme of the phenomenon is speculative, yet it is reasonable enough.

In this connection the following works are worthy of special attention.

Observations of the psychiatrist G. P. Krokhalev, who carried out experiments on registration on film of the emissions of psychophysical structures of ill people beyond the brain limits (hallucinations) [14].

Lepton-photon hypothesis of B. I. Iskakov proposes that human thoughts and emotions are material and make up about 10-39 – 10-30 grams by weight [15].

In the given examples macroobjects, although consisting of nonliving matter, can carry out certain actions according to the medium’s will. The famous medium Yu. V. Tarasov thinks that [16]: “… one can impose his will on anybody. Even an iron can be stirred up against a man. It is true as the machinery doesn’t possess consciousness, but where is the boundary between animate and inanimate nature? Everything is relative in this world. Thus, life can be not only biological, but crystalline, wave and other. And each object can perform any command”. The biophysicist A. P. Dubrov is sure [2, page 166] that nowadays there is no information about any differences in physical properties of atoms in the molecules of living and nonliving systems. The psychologist V. N. Pushkin suggests [2, page 109] a hypothesis that the forms of living and nonliving objects and perception images possess common physical (biophysical) properties as wave (field) structures.

If this is the case, i.e. if any form of substance represents a steady mass of standing waves of maximum concentration and contains complete information about itself; stays in the latent wave form (“information model”) in any point of space, is capable of developing and functioning using IPRI with the environment, then one can make a good use of it for various fields of natural science, such as, for example, materials manufacturing techniques.

An example of the use of IPRI

Substance synthesis

Let us consider the use of IPRI, for example, in the sphere of materials synthesis.

Obtaining perfect crystal structures is of primary importance for production of reproducible semiconducting materials. Foundations of the material crystal structure are to a certain extent laid during the process of compound semiconductor synthesis from the environment.

The technology of obtaining a final product in poly- or mono-crystal form is complicated and extremely sensitive to various physical factors. The compound is crystallized from the gas phase, water solutions or melts.

Crystallization of a compound from melt is characterized by the presence of two primary areas, namely melt containing all necessary components of the synthesized compound and crystallized material. It is obvious that the quality of compound obtained in the course of crystallization depends on wether the conditions necessary for crystallization were provided or not. Providing these conditions is rather a difficult task, because it demands complete understanding of happening physico-chemical processes, and modern processing equipment capable of guaranteeing conditions necessary to carry on these processes.

Thus, on the one hand, the task is limited to technological equipment necessary to carry on physico-chemical processes of materials synthesis (A), and, on the other hand, to providing reproducibility of crystal structures in the process of synthesis (B).

 

 

Obtaining reproducible crystal structures can be provided only by using the effect of IPRI.

In accordance with the hypothesis of nonlocal property of macroobjects and the effect of IPRI considered above, the solution of the task of reproducibility of crystal structures during the process of synthesis from the environment has got the following stages:

1. Creating of specific conditions necessary to carry on physico-chemical processes of crystallization.

2. Providing IPRI between crystal-inductor (“template”) and crystal-percipient.

To make sure of IPRI between the macroobjects of substance, and, at the same time, evaluate the possibilities of using IPRI during the process of reproducibility of crystals properties, one can make the following experiment.

There is a steady process of synthesis of any crystal.

One should take such crystal with a pronounced structural defect as a crystal-inductor.

In order to provide IPRI one should build a system “receiving antenna” – waveguide – “transmitting antenna”. Antennas, i.e. of horn type must guarantee reception and transmission at frequencies 0.1-0.2 GHz and 80-82 GHz.

Through the “receiving antenna” the model of the crystal-inductor will be transmitted by means of the waveguide to the “transmitting antenna” aimed at the edge of crystallization of the synthesized crystal-percipient.

Repetition of the pronounced defect of the crystal-inductor by the growing crystal-percipient is to be considered the positive result of the experiment.

If the obtained results are repeated stably enough during experiments with other specimen of various forms and physico-chemical composition, then it will be necessary to analyze the possibility of recording an information model of the crystal-donor on a magnetic medium. If, when using an information model from a magnetic medium instead of the original crystal-inductor, the results will be the same, then there is a possibility of creating a bank of information models of macroobjects. Then, synthesizing various information models, one can obtain new materials with the desired properties.

From the physico-chemical point of view, the process of crystal form synthesis on the edge of crystallization is similar to vital functions of biological objects. Thus, the biophysicist A. P. Dubrov believes that “… a living organism is regarded … as an integral quasicrystal substance, where the phenomenon of coherence seems to be decisive for the development of interaction between internal and external electromagnetic fields. … Biological objects can be considered as liquid crystal elements … it is obvious that investigators have a right to use liquid crystal elements and the phenomena taking place in them as a reference approximate model for the analysis of interaction between the electromagnetic radiation and the living substance that we are so much interested in.” [2].

References:

  1. Avramenko R. F., Nikolaeva V. I. Holographic properties of hypersphere // Holography problems. - Moscow, 1975. Ed. N5. P. 64-75.
  2. Dubov A. P., Pushkin V. E. Parapsychology and modern natural science. - Moscow: Saint-Petersburg "Sovaminko", 1989. P. 280.
  3. Westlake F. R. About the possibility of neuroholographiс processes going on in brain // Cybernetic problems of bionics. Moscow: Mir, 1972.
  4. Ukhtomskiy A. A. About the resonant theory of nervous behavior // Colleted works. Leningrad: Leningrad State University. Vol. 6. P. 50-55.
  5. Balubova D. V., Avramenko R. F., Nikolaeva V. I., Pushkin V. N. Information energetics and the hypothesis of wave psychophysics // Electropuncture and problems of information-energy regulation of human activity. Moscow, 1976. P. 168-185.
  6. Woodworth R. Experimental psychology. Moscow: Foreign literature publishing house, 1950.
  7. "Znanie sila", 8, 1989. P. 37-41.
  8. Herbert В. Biogravitation: Experimental Evidences // Int. Jour. Paraphysics. Leningrad, 1977. Vol. 11, N5/6. P. 91-116. 1979. Vol.13, N1/2. P. 27-31.
  9. Andreas P., Kilian C. Die Phantastische Wissenschaft // Parapsychologie: Beweise fur das Unglaubliche. Dusseldorf; Wien: Econ Verlag, 1973.
  10. Nakaoka T. Parapsychological Argument in Japan. Second Int. Congress on Psychotronic Research, June 3 - July 4. Monte Carlo, 1975. P. 209-210.
  11. Shuhuang Lin, Zhungchi Zhang, Weiyi Liu et al. Some experiments with the moving of objects through "Exceptional functions of the human body" // Psi research.
    1983. Vol.2, N1. P. 3-24.
  12. Gerlovin I. L. Fundamentals of the unified theory of all interactions in substance. Leningrad, ENERGOATOMIZDAT, Leningrad branch, 1990.
  13. Protodyakonov M. M., Gerlovin I. L. Electron structure and physical properties of crystals. Мoscow: Nauka, 1975.
  14. Krokhalev G. P. Photographing of visual hallucinations: materials of the 3rd congress on psychotronics. Tokyo, 1977. P. 487-489.
  15. B. I. Iskakov. Quantum-statistical modeling of bioenergetic phenomena and lepton hypothesis about the nature of biological objects’ physical fields // Problems of statistics and econometric modeling. Moscow: Moscow Institute of National Economy named after G. V. Plekhanov, 1987. Ed.12. P. 3-27.
  16. “Moskovskiy komsomolets” of 01.07.1990.

 

Publishing date: January 19, 2009
Source: SciTecLibrary.ru

Back

 

Copyright © SciTecLibrary


To add the material   Terms of registration   Terms for placing technology, inventions, productions & other informations   Price list




Rambler's Top100 Rambler's Top100 ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ