Articles and Publication Physics Theoretical physics INFORMATION-POWER RESONANT INTERACTION IN SUBSTANCE
INFORMATION-POWER
RESONANT INTERACTION IN SUBSTANCE
© V.V. Barygin,
Dr.Sc.
Contact to the author:
valery.barygin@relicom.ru
A concept of technologies using
Information-Power Resonant Interaction (IPRI – abbreviation from the English
transcription) between material and non-material objects is developed in this
work. A variant of experimental demonstration of the action of IPRI is suggested.
There is also given an example of the use of IPRI in the technology of materials’
synthesis.
_______________________________________________________________________________
KEY THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Introduction
Objects situated around us and
observed by us (macroobjects) constitute a system of material particles
connected by means of field interaction. It is well known that, possessing wave
properties, a particle doesn’t have precise locality in space. Due to this fact
information about a particle of substance is contained in any part of the
Universe.
Further we shall base on a closed
cosmological model of the Universe (hypersphere), in which a macroobject is a
steady mass of standing waves of maximum concentration [1] (packet of amplitudes),
realizing the property of “a hologram by itself”. In accordance with the
hypothesis about the nonlocal property of macroobjects the latter, as well as
isolated particles, stay in any point of space in a wave form concealed from the
observer.
Interaction of macroobjects
In accordance with the hypothesis
of quantum-wave image coding formulated by the famous Soviet psychologist V. N.
Pushkin [2, page 33], formation of space properties of a macroobject upon
perception can be considered as a process of origination of a certain system of
standing waves with amplitude distribution corresponding to the displayed
object’s curvature. This formation function is ensured by quantum-mechanical
processes in cerebral cells and based upon the information received as a result
of recent natural-science investigations [3].
The condition for macroobject
initialization is the goal on the basis of which the macroobject “mental model”
is developed.
This logic chain allows us to
presume that all possible “mental models” already exist in space in a latent
wave form (“information models”). In other words, everything that a man can
imagine already exists. A similar “physico-theoretical criterion” was put
forward by Soviet astrophysicist and philosopher G. I. Naan: “there exists
everything that can be realized in accordance with the laws of nature”.
Let us illustrate this by an
example of how a sculptor moulds his sculpture.
Let us suppose that the sculptor
wishes to create the sculpture of a horse – this is the purpose.
He imagines the sculpture as the
running horse.
The sculptor is thinking about
his dream for a long time, as a result his brain, resonating with the
“information model” of the horse, builds its own “mental model”. At some stage
the sculptor decides to realize his “mental model” and begins to mould,
realizing it by the way of physical forming of clay. Now there begins the
similar process where the “mental model” of the horse (which has already been
built by the sculptor) and the object being formed from clay are resonating. At
this stage the goal is to achieve maximum correspondence (resonance) between the
“mental model” and sculpture of the horse originating from the material
substance (clay).
The clay horse obtained as a
result of this process may, to a greater or lesser extent, satisfy the
sculptor’s “mental model”, and to some extent correspond to the “information
model” – a true image of a living horse.
Such process of formation and
personification of a “mental model” must probably accompany any kind of creative
human activity.
As it is obvious from the
example, Information-Power Resonant
Interaction (hereinafter referred to as IPRI) of models is
the main mechanism of formation of a “mental model” or a material macroobject.
The idea of resonant informative
control between various nerve centres within the system of intellectual
self-regulation was developed by the famous Russian physiologist A. A. Ukhtomsky
[4] and proved experimentally [5,6].
Let us consider the IPRI
mechanism in more details in order to comprehend its true meaning.
Investigations of a scientist
from Khabarovsk doctor Tszyan Kanchzhen, bringing out clearly not only the
existence of the mechanism of informative resonant interaction, but its real
action as well, are the most impressing. The essence of his theory is that vital
activity and especially formation of a macroobject is accompanied by information
interchange with the ambient space, which determines further development of the
macroobject. To prove this idea there have been carried out experiments aimed at
estimation of the influence of inductor bioinformation energetic field on the
process of percipient formation. As a result of numerous experiments it is
proved that the percipient perceives certain characteristics of the inductor
that remain in further processes of percipient’s reproduction, and realizes them
in the process of its own formation. Thus, there were bred chickens with the
features of the duck, such as webbed feet helping them to swim, and webbed ears
helping them to dive, as well as a hen covered with hair, a hybrid of corn with
wheat and so on [7]. Information was transferred at superhigh frequencies. It
was taken from the inductor by a system of horn antennas and transmitted to the
percipient by waveguides.
The results of experiments
carried out by doctor Tszyan prove the action of IPRI between macro
substances within the frameworks of the hypothesis of quantum-wave image coding.
Namely, spatial physical properties of a percipient were formed upon resonant
adjustment of the percipient’s amplitude packet to the inductor’s amplitude
packet carried out by a mechanical system “antenna – transmission line -
oscillator”.
There are numerous facts known
with regard to IPRI between macro substances from living and nonliving
substance proved in many laboratories of the world [8, 9, 10]. These facts are
interpreted as the appearance of such phenomenon as psychokinesis, i.e. mental
influence of a man as an object of living matter upon surrounding objects.
Let us cite one of the
experiments with a famous Soviet medium V. V. Ermolaev as an example. Among the
scientists observing the experiment and recording the results there was the
famous psychologist, professor, doctor of psychological sciences V. N. Pushkin,
and biophysicist, doctor of biological sciences A. P. Dubrov. In the course of
the experiment “hanging” of a matchbox in the airspace between the medium’s
hands was fixed. The distance between the hands and the box was more than 5
centimeters. Preliminary concentration of the medium’s thoughts on the object
and its “persuasion” is characteristic to this one and similar experiments.
Experiments required great power inputs of the medium, nevertheless the
probationer accentuated that the object’s quality and weight were not important
for such demonstrations.
Let us consider the above
mentioned example as a result of the action of IPRI between the medium
and the object.
The initial process of
concentration of the medium’s thoughts on the object and its “persuasion”, allow
to suppose that it is nothing but the medium’s desire to build the “mental
model” of the selected object as exactly as possible, and adjustment of IPRI
between the “mental model” and the object. This is proved by the fact that the
medium is capable of selective influence upon the neighboring objects, as well
as that familiar objects are easier to “hang up”. When the medium manages to lay
this “resonant bridge”, that becomes apparent from “sticking” of the object to
palms, then, by transforming the “mental model” (but not the object itself), the
medium is permitted to manipulate the object itself as well. That’s why the art
of meditation, that is, mental concentration, is so important for yogis. The
described process is reflected in the hypothesis of the psychologist V. N.
Pushkin [2, page 31]: “… it is enough to ensure the necessary focusing in the
given point of space that will allow the observer to reveal the wave structures
of faraway objects hidden in each point”.
Let us consider one more
extremely interesting phenomenon of medium’s dematerialization, teleportation
and materialization of macroobjects from living and nonliving matter that was
proved experimentally [11]. An objective control over everything happening was
carried out with the help of modern electronics. Thus, for example [2, page
249], mechanical and electronic clock was shifted under the medium’s mental
influence. At that, mechanical clock didn’t stop (the default time was 30
minutes 43 seconds), and electronic clock was 7,5 minutes slow, total duration
of the experiment making up 9 minutes. After disappearance and transportation
(11-73 minutes) insects (fruit-flies) had been alive for several days.
Let us determine the general
scheme of this phenomenon using IPRI.
The first stage is concentrating
the medium’s thought on the object for the purpose of formation of its “mental
model”, and laying the “resonant bridge”.
The second stage is dematerialization.
To find an explanation of the
phenomenon of dematerialization of the object we shall have to go deeper into
the theory of matter consideration as a material substance, possessing weight as
the measure of inertia in many-dimensional and stratificated substance [12],
using such mathematical apparatus as discrete-continuous geometry [13]. The
theory assumes that the mass can be positive, negative or even virtual, but it
must be a quantum number characterizing any structural element of substance.
Not getting deeper into the above
mentioned theories, let us only presume that as a result of teleportation
process connected with certain subconscious work of human body, directed at
fundamental code of the object’s substance, the same transforms into virtual
state (dematerializes) and exists in nonmaterial state (the latent wave form) in
one of subspaces (“information model”), conforming to the law of triunity.
The third stage is
materialization. The medium concentrates all his attention on the place where
the object should be shifted to, and realizes the “resonant bridge” between his
“mental model” of the object and “information model” situated in the given place
in the latent wave form. As a result the object “mental model” materializes its
“information model”.
Of course the suggested scheme of
the phenomenon is speculative, yet it is reasonable enough.
In this connection the following
works are worthy of special attention.
Observations of the psychiatrist
G. P. Krokhalev, who carried out experiments on registration on film of the
emissions of psychophysical structures of ill people beyond the brain limits
(hallucinations) [14].
Lepton-photon hypothesis of B. I.
Iskakov proposes that human thoughts and emotions are material and make up about
10-39 – 10-30 grams by weight [15].
In the given examples
macroobjects, although consisting of nonliving matter, can carry out certain
actions according to the medium’s will. The famous medium Yu. V. Tarasov thinks
that [16]: “… one can impose his will on anybody. Even an iron can be stirred up
against a man. It is true as the machinery doesn’t possess consciousness, but
where is the boundary between animate and inanimate nature? Everything is
relative in this world. Thus, life can be not only biological, but crystalline,
wave and other. And each object can perform any command”. The biophysicist A. P.
Dubrov is sure [2, page 166] that nowadays there is no information about any
differences in physical properties of atoms in the molecules of living and
nonliving systems. The psychologist V. N. Pushkin suggests [2, page 109] a
hypothesis that the forms of living and nonliving objects and perception images
possess common physical (biophysical) properties as wave (field) structures.
If this is the case, i.e. if any
form of substance represents a steady mass of standing waves of maximum
concentration and contains complete information about itself; stays in the
latent wave form (“information model”) in any point of space, is capable of
developing and functioning using IPRI with the environment, then one can
make a good use of it for various fields of natural science, such as, for
example, materials manufacturing techniques.
An example of the use of IPRI
Substance synthesis
Let us consider the use of
IPRI, for example, in the sphere of materials synthesis.
Obtaining perfect crystal
structures is of primary importance for production of reproducible
semiconducting materials. Foundations of the material crystal structure are to a
certain extent laid during the process of compound semiconductor synthesis from
the environment.
The technology of obtaining a
final product in poly- or mono-crystal form is complicated and extremely
sensitive to various physical factors. The compound is crystallized from the gas
phase, water solutions or melts.
Crystallization of a compound
from melt is characterized by the presence of two primary areas, namely melt
containing all necessary components of the synthesized compound and crystallized
material. It is obvious that the quality of compound obtained in the course of
crystallization depends on wether the conditions necessary for crystallization
were provided or not. Providing these conditions is rather a difficult task,
because it demands complete understanding of happening physico-chemical
processes, and modern processing equipment capable of guaranteeing conditions
necessary to carry on these processes.
Thus, on the one hand, the task
is limited to technological equipment necessary to carry on physico-chemical
processes of materials synthesis (A), and, on the other hand, to
providing reproducibility of crystal structures in the process of synthesis (B).

Obtaining reproducible crystal
structures can be provided only by using the effect of IPRI.
In accordance with the hypothesis
of nonlocal property of macroobjects and the effect of IPRI considered
above, the solution of the task of reproducibility of crystal structures during
the process of synthesis from the environment has got the following stages:
1. Creating of specific
conditions necessary to carry on physico-chemical processes of crystallization.
2. Providing IPRI between
crystal-inductor (“template”) and crystal-percipient.
To make sure of IPRI
between the macroobjects of substance, and, at the same time, evaluate the
possibilities of using IPRI during the process of reproducibility of
crystals properties, one can make the following experiment.
There is a steady process of
synthesis of any crystal.
One should take such crystal with
a pronounced structural defect as a crystal-inductor.
In order to provide IPRI
one should build a system “receiving antenna” – waveguide – “transmitting
antenna”. Antennas, i.e. of horn type must guarantee reception and transmission
at frequencies 0.1-0.2 GHz and 80-82 GHz.
Through the “receiving antenna”
the model of the crystal-inductor will be transmitted by means of the waveguide
to the “transmitting antenna” aimed at the edge of crystallization of the
synthesized crystal-percipient.
Repetition of the pronounced
defect of the crystal-inductor by the growing crystal-percipient is to be
considered the positive result of the experiment.
If the obtained results are
repeated stably enough during experiments with other specimen of various forms
and physico-chemical composition, then it will be necessary to analyze the
possibility of recording an information model of the crystal-donor on a magnetic
medium. If, when using an information model from a magnetic medium instead of
the original crystal-inductor, the results will be the same, then there is a
possibility of creating a bank of information models of macroobjects. Then,
synthesizing various information models, one can obtain new materials with the
desired properties.
From the physico-chemical point
of view, the process of crystal form synthesis on the edge of crystallization is
similar to vital functions of biological objects. Thus, the biophysicist A. P.
Dubrov believes that “… a living organism is
regarded … as an integral quasicrystal substance, where the phenomenon of
coherence seems to be decisive for the development of interaction between
internal and external electromagnetic fields. … Biological objects can be
considered as liquid crystal elements … it is obvious that investigators have a
right to use liquid crystal elements and the phenomena taking place in them as a
reference approximate model for the analysis of interaction between the
electromagnetic radiation and the living substance that we are so much
interested in.” [2].
References:
- Avramenko R. F., Nikolaeva V. I. Holographic
properties of hypersphere // Holography problems. - Moscow, 1975. Ed. N5. P.
64-75.
- Dubov A. P., Pushkin V. E. Parapsychology
and modern natural science. - Moscow: Saint-Petersburg "Sovaminko", 1989. P.
280.
- Westlake F. R. About the possibility of
neuroholographiс processes going on in brain // Cybernetic problems of
bionics. Moscow: Mir, 1972.
- Ukhtomskiy A. A. About the resonant theory
of nervous behavior // Colleted works. Leningrad: Leningrad State University.
Vol. 6. P. 50-55.
- Balubova D. V., Avramenko R. F., Nikolaeva
V. I., Pushkin V. N. Information energetics and the hypothesis of wave
psychophysics // Electropuncture and problems of information-energy
regulation of human activity. Moscow, 1976. P. 168-185.
- Woodworth R. Experimental psychology. Moscow:
Foreign literature publishing house, 1950.
- "Znanie sila", 8, 1989. P. 37-41.
- Herbert В. Biogravitation: Experimental
Evidences // Int. Jour. Paraphysics. Leningrad, 1977. Vol. 11, N5/6. P.
91-116. 1979. Vol.13, N1/2. P. 27-31.
- Andreas P., Kilian C. Die Phantastische
Wissenschaft // Parapsychologie: Beweise fur das Unglaubliche. Dusseldorf;
Wien: Econ Verlag, 1973.
- Nakaoka T. Parapsychological Argument in
Japan. Second Int. Congress on Psychotronic Research, June 3 - July 4. Monte
Carlo, 1975. P. 209-210.
- Shuhuang Lin, Zhungchi Zhang, Weiyi Liu et
al. Some experiments with the moving of objects through "Exceptional
functions of the human body" // Psi research.
1983. Vol.2, N1. P. 3-24.
- Gerlovin I. L. Fundamentals of the unified
theory of all interactions in substance. Leningrad, ENERGOATOMIZDAT,
Leningrad branch, 1990.
- Protodyakonov M. M., Gerlovin I. L. Electron
structure and physical properties of crystals. Мoscow: Nauka, 1975.
- Krokhalev G. P. Photographing of visual
hallucinations: materials of the 3rd congress on psychotronics.
Tokyo, 1977. P. 487-489.
- B. I. Iskakov. Quantum-statistical modeling
of bioenergetic phenomena and lepton hypothesis about the nature of
biological objects’ physical fields // Problems of statistics and
econometric modeling. Moscow: Moscow Institute of National Economy named
after G. V. Plekhanov, 1987. Ed.12. P. 3-27.
- “Moskovskiy komsomolets” of 01.07.1990.
Publishing date: January 19, 2009
Source: SciTecLibrary.ru
Back
|