Scientific News Natural Cataclysm Space threat Sandia supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster
Sandia
supercomputers offer new explanation of Tunguska disaster
Smaller asteroids
may pose greater danger than previously believed
ALBUQUERQUE,
N.M. — The stunning amount of forest devastation at Tunguska a century ago in
Siberia may have been caused by an asteroid only a fraction as large as
previously published estimates, Sandia National Laboratories supercomputer
simulations suggest.
“The asteroid that caused the
extensive damage was much smaller than we had thought,” says Sandia principal
investigator Mark Boslough of the impact that occurred June 30, 1908. “That
such a small object can do this kind of destruction suggests that smaller
asteroids are something to consider. Their smaller size indicates such
collisions are not as improbable as we had believed.”
Because smaller asteroids
approach Earth statistically more frequently than larger ones, he says, “We
should be making more efforts at detecting the smaller ones than we have till
now.”
The new simulation — which more
closely matches the widely known facts of destruction than earlier models —
shows that the center of mass of an asteroid exploding above the ground is
transported downward at speeds faster than sound. It takes the form of a
high-temperature jet of expanding gas called a fireball.
This causes stronger blast waves
and thermal radiation pulses at the surface than would be predicted by an
explosion limited to the height at which the blast was initiated.
“Our understanding was
oversimplified,” says Boslough, “We no longer have to make the same
simplifying assumptions, because present-day supercomputers allow us to do
things with high resolution in 3-D. Everything gets clearer as you look at
things with more refined tools.”
Sandia is a National Nuclear
Security Administration laboratory.
The new interpretation also
accounts for the fact that winds were amplified above ridgelines where trees
tended to be blown down, and that the forest at the time of the explosion,
according to foresters, was not healthy. Thus previous scientific estimates had
overstated the devastation caused by the asteroid, since topographic and
ecologic factors contributing to the result had not been taken into account.
“There’s actually less
devastation than previously thought,” says Boslough, “but it was caused by a
far smaller asteroid. Unfortunately, it’s not a complete wash in terms of the
potential hazard, because there are more smaller asteroids than larger ones.”
Boslough and colleagues achieved
fame more than a decade ago by accurately predicting that that the fireball
caused by the intersection of the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter would be
observable from Earth.
Simulations show that the
material of an incoming asteroid is compressed by the increasing resistance of
Earth’s atmosphere. As it penetrates deeper, the more and more resistant
atmospheric wall causes it to explode as an airburst that precipitates the
downward flow of heated gas.
Because of the additional energy
transported toward the surface by the fireball, what scientists had thought to
be an explosion between 10 and 20 megatons was more likely only three to five
megatons. The physical size of the asteroid, says Boslough, depends upon its
speed and whether it is porous or nonporous, icy or waterless, and other
material characteristics.
“Any strategy for defense or
deflection should take into consideration this revised understanding of the
mechanism of explosion,” says Boslough.
One of most prominent papers in
estimating frequency of impact was published five years ago in Nature by
Sandia researcher Dick Spalding and his colleagues, from satellite data on
explosions in atmosphere. “They can count those events and estimate
frequencies of arrival through probabilistic arguments,” says Boslough.
The work was presented at the
American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco on Dec. 11. A paper on the
phenomenon, co-authored by Sandia researcher Dave Crawford and entitled
“Low–altitude airbursts and the impact threat” has been accepted for
publication in the International Journal of Impact Engineering.
The research was paid for by
Sandia’s Laboratory-Directed Research and Development office.
Sandia news media contact: Neal
Singer, nsinger@sandia.gov,
(505) 845-7078
Publishing date: January 18, 2008
Back
|