Articles and Publication Hypotheses Hypotheses of changes on the Earth PHYSICAL NATURE OF ORIGIN OF NUCLEARS, OF GREEN-STONE BELTS, ANCIENT LITHOSPHERIC PLATES AND THE EARTH MANTL
PHYSICAL
NATURE OF ORIGIN OF NUCLEARS, OF GREEN-STONE BELTS, ANCIENT LITHOSPHERIC PLATES
AND THE EARTH MANTL.
© M. A.
Gaysin
Contact
to the author: giesin_murat@mail.ru
Annotation
The author has made a
reconstruction of the terrestrial globe with the help of the alternative theory
of the accelerating Earth accretion. The results have been produced which can
explain many of geological processes including the nature of origin of nuclears,
of green-stone belts, ancient lithospheric plates and the Earth mantle.
Modern conception of the Earth
evolution.
The Earth formation with magmatic ocean on the Earth
surface and the core formation (4.6 – 4.5 billion years ago);
Origin of the initial crust and the asthenosphere,
origin of the atmosphere and the hydrosphere (4.5 – 4.2 billion years ago);
Mantle heating and occurrence of the first signs
of the plate tectonics (4.2 – 3.9 billion years ago);
The development of plate-tectonic processes,
protocontinents formation up to the birth of the first supercontinent Pangaea
– (3.9 – 2.5 billion years ago);
The continuation of the active plate-tectonic
processes with the periodical oceans’ opening and the continental masses
accretion (2.5 billion years to present day).
The conventional paradigm is
based on the suggestion that the Earth’s size is fixed in time and the main
planetary process is the chemical-density differentiation of the Earth’s
matter which led to the occurrence of the iron-oxide core.
Alternative conception of the
Earth’s evolution.
W. Carry [3] in his book “In
Search of mechanisms of the Earth and the Universe Development” mentions the
possible reasons for the accelerating accretion of the Earth (point 3): “The
theory postulates that originally the Earth had the core of the superdense
matter which slowly transformed into normal matter and led to the gradual
accretion of the planet. Various models of this kind have been proposed by the
scientists from the USA, Canada, Australia, Hungary, Great Britain, Germany and
the USSR. According to these models the superdense core was inherited from some
earlier stage (before the Earth liberated from its stellar progenitor) and
remained ever since in this metastable state. That is why according to this
hypothesis the matter of the unstable superdense core penetrates into less dense
materials and this leads to a significant accretion of the Earth”. These
theories suggest that the oceans have been formed within the last 150 million
years. They make up about three fourths of the Earth’s surface, at the same
time the Earth diameter has increased almost twice. There remains, however, an
insuperable obstacle for these theories – the postulate which states that the
initial Earth had the same mass as it has now but its diameter was half. In this
case the gravity on the surface would have been four times as much from the
present value and it would have had an effect on many geologic processes.
Professor Stuart from Redington University, England rejected the idea of the
Earth’s accretion by this exact reason.
Refinements to the alternative
conception of the Earth’s evolution.
The author of the paper also
supports the theory of the accelerating accretion of the Earth but has to make
considerable refinements. Is that really so that within 150 million years the
Earth’s diameter has increased twice? Even the simplest calculations show it
is not true. First of all, let us ask ourselves a simple question – why do
rivers flow? Thousands and thousands of kilometers and practically all of them
flow into the oceans. There should be a strong reason for that. This reason is
the difference between the curvature of continents and the general curvature of
the Earth. W. Carry in his book “In Search of mechanisms of the Earth and the
Universe Development” (p.290) writes: “In the Earth accretion theory
continental blocks are regarded as prisms with the depth of about 3000 km. It is
believed that the continents remain on the same mantle area where they were
located originally, their separation is due to the growth of the new oceanic
crust between them in the course of the Earth accretion. Claus Fogel has
established and Schmidt Amblton has proved later: the separation of the
continents took place when, during the process of the Earth accretion, they
moved radially, in opposite directions from each other”.
The author claims that the
continents not only separate radially, they also preserve the initial Earth’s
curvature. That is why the continents are
like icebergs – one can see only their part on the surface.

Pic. 1 The floor of the oceans
map
Oceans’ area is 361.1 million
km2. The oceans’ floor contour also includes continental shelves
and continental slopes which make up 9,6% and 13% correspondingly (table 1).
These areas reasoning from their structure should be a part of continents’
area. Thus, considering this correction, the real continents’ area is equal to:
Sko = 149.1 +
361.1*(9.6+13)/ 100 = 230.7 million km2.
Real sizes of the continent can
be well seen on the “Floor of the oceans” map (Pic.1).
[1] Main zones of the World
ocean’s floor
Table 1
|
Shelf’s constituents
|
Depth, m
|
Part relatively to the
oceans area, %
|
|
Shelf
|
0-300
|
9.6
|
|
Continental slope
|
300-2500
|
13.0
|
|
Abyss
|
2500-6500
|
76.5
|
|
Deep-water trenches
|
6500-11000
|
0.9
|
The author has reconstructed the
Earth into the past, in the times of the ancient crystal plates formation, along
the curvature of the continental slope. The
difference between the curvature of the continental slope and the modern
curvature of the Earth is equal to 15° - [1] “The continental slope is
characterized by the steep submergence of the floor which amounts to 15° and
more.” That means that the slope goes down 258.82 m vertically per each
kilometer of the ocean’s surface.
∆h =1000 m * sin
15° = 258.82 m
Having multiplied ∆h by the
half of the Earth’s circumference, one can get the difference between the
diameter of the modern Earth and the diameter of the Earth of the times of
ancient crystal platforms formation.
∆d = ∆h
* Ookr/2; ∆d = 0.25882* 20 000 km = 5 176
km.
Thus, the desired value of the
Earth’s radius – Rk can be found:
Rk = (D0 -
∆d)/2; Rk =(12742 – 5176)/2 = 3783 km.
Then the area of the Earth’s
surface was approximately equal to:
Skr = 4πRk2;
Skr = 4*3.14* 37832 = 179.75 million km2.
The author has made the
verification checkout by adding the areas of the ancient crystal platforms of
the modern continents.
The sum of the Earth’s
continents areas is equal to 149.1 million km2.
All continents except Eurasia are
the ancient crystal platforms [2] (picture 2). The area of the Earth’s
continents without Eurasia equals to:
Sk-e = 149.1 – 53.45
= 95.65 million km2.

Picture 2
The Eurasian continent consists
of the ancient crystal platforms and younger platforms. The approximate area of
the ancient crystal platforms of Eurasia is 18.23 million km2.
Arabian platform - 3.5 million km2;
Indian platform - 3.2 million km2;
2 Chinese platforms - 1.65 million km2;
East-Siberian platform - 4.63 million km2;
Baltic shield and East European plate - 5.25
million km2.
Besides, the ancient shelves of
the Paleoasiatic ocean are included in this sum as the flexures of the ancient
crystal platforms. The areas of the two continents of Eurasia and the
Paleoasiatic ocean can be found out of the two following ratios:
Sm_a+ So_a=
53.45 and Sm_a+ 0.096* So_a = 18.23
Thus, the area of the ancient
continents of Eurasia equals to 14.49 million km2; And the area of
the Paleoasiatic ocean is equal to 38.96 million km2;

Picture 3
Altogether the area of surfaces
of the Earth’s ancient crystal platforms is approximately 110.14 million km2:
Sk-sc = 95.65 + 14.49
=110.14 million km2
But this does not include the
shelves and the continental slopes of the ancient Paleoasiatic ocean [2] Picture
3.
Sa_sc = 38.96*
(0.096+0.13) = 8.8 million km2.
And it does not include the areas
of the shelf and the continental slope of the modern oceans.
Ss+c =
361.1*(0.096+0.13) = 81.6 million km2.
Let us calculate which part of
the shelf and the continental slope refers to the ancient crystal platforms.
149.1 million km2 -
81.6 million km2 as well as
110.14 million km2 - Sks+с
Sks+с = (110.14
* 81.6)/ 149.1 = 60.28 million km2.
Thus, the total area of the
ancient crystal platforms of the modern continents is equal to: Sk =
110.14 + 8.8 + 60.28 = 179.22 million km2.
The verification checkout has
confirmed the correctness of the preceding statement. The result of the
verification checkout almost completely coincides with design area Skr
= 179.75 million km2.
The following level:
The author has determined the average velocity of the earth’s accretion.
The age of the ancient crystal platforms is 2.5—3.0 billion years. The
reference point is the near bound of 2.5 billion years as it is the time of the
final formation of the curvature of the ancient crystal platforms.
According to the previous
calculations 2.5 billion years ago the Earth’s radius was equal to Rk
= 3783 km.
∆Rk = R0
– Rk; ∆Rk = 6371 – 3783 = 2588 km.
The average velocity of the
Earth’s radius expansion is:
VR = 2588/2500 = 1.035
km/million years.
The
physical model of the evolution of the terrestrial globe.
It follows that the superdense
cores of the Earth and the Moon were inherited by some earlier stage, from the
stellar progenitor. The author suggested that in the beginning of the evolution
the size of the Earth coincided with the size of the Earth’s inner core, i.e.
the Earth’s inner core was the terrestrial globe itself. The suggestion of the
superdensity of the Earth’s inner core lets not take into account its
downsizing during the evolution (?).
Ry = 1250 km
∆Rу = 6371
-1250 = 5121 km
Тz = 5121/1.035
= 4948 million years ago.
Slightly less than 5 billion
years ago the evolution of the terrestrial globe started. This result the author
considers to be more reliable than the conventional one - 4.6 billion years.
Since the conventional Earth’s age was determined by the age of the most
ancient rocks of the Earth, the Moon and meteorites it follows that the age was
defined without taking into account the period when the Earth’s surface was in
hot liquid state. The author suggests that originally the surfaces of the Earth
and the Moon were composed of very hot liquid magma. The cores of the Earth and
the Moon expanded the areas of the emitting surfaces by generating some volume
of the normal matter. That is why the process of slow cooling of the Earth and
the Moon took place. After 548 million years after the beginning of the
evolution the surface temperature of the Earth fell as low as 2663° С. [Internet
message] “Until now the oldest age for the granite was considered to be 4
billion years. But analyzing the Jack-Hills zircon it was found out that it was
formed much earlier. The scientists dated the granite sample by extracting 20
mkm3 of the zircon out of it and measuring the isotopic composition
of lead on the extremely sensitive ion microprobe (the lead which was formed
after the radioactive decay of uranium is meant). It turned out that the
zircon’s age is 4.4 billion years. Perhaps our planet represented the one
magmatic “ocean”…”, “The zircon (zirconium silicate) consists of ZrO2
(63%) and SiO2 (32%). This is the natural mineral with the density of
4,6 g/sm3. The melting temperature is 2600° С”. But since
the melting temperature of zirconium oxide ZrO2 is 2700° С.,
the zircon consolidation started with the consolidation of zircon dioxide.
Taking into account the fact that the part of 63% from the mineral’s
composition began to accumulate uranium decay products starting at 2700°
С., it can be concluded that the temperature of the beginning of uranium
decay products accumulating by zircon was 2663° С and not 2600° С.
[the Internet message]
“The liquid water already appeared on the Earth 3.8 billion years ago
judging by the presence of remainders deposited in the aqueous medium in the
rocks of the same age in Greenland. It follows that the condensation of the
water vapor which was present in the atmosphere has started by that time”.
That means that 600 million years
after the beginning of the refractory rocks consolidation the temperature of the
Earth’s surface dropped to 100 degrees and lower (without taking into account
the pressure of that time and therefore the water boiling-point). Here it is
possible to define the average temperature reduction rate of the Earth’s
surface:
Vt = (2663° -100°)/600
= 4.272 degrees/million years
That means that at the beginning
of the evolution the terrestrial globe had the following surface temperature:
Tem4948 = 2663° +
548* 4.272 = 5004° С.
The verification checkout of the
thermal gradient:
Four billion years ago the
temperature of the Earth’s surface dropped up to the granite consolidation
temperature:
Tem4000 = 2 663°
– 400*4.272 = 954°.
Indeed, the granite melting
temperature is 950°. “Under the pressure 1 atmosphere the granite melting
temperature equals to 950° С. and it increases with the increase of
pressure”.
The Earth’s radius then
increased up to R4000 = 6371 - 4000*1.035 = 2231 km.
The Earth’s surface area
increased up to S4000 = 62.5 million km2.
175 million years after the
beginning of rocks consolidation the volcanic activity occured. [The Internet
message] “The earliest volcanic rocks on the Earth were discovered by Canadian
geologists in the North of Quebec province. Their age dates 3,825 billion years.
The discovery was made on the bank of the Hudson Bay during the cartographical
works. The age of the rocks which occupied an area of 16 square kilometers was
found thanks to isotope analysis”.
25 million years after that the
temperature of the Earth’s surface dropped to 100° and lower, the first
shallow ocean emerged, it covered the whole Earth’s surface since the
Earth’s surface relief was feebly marked because of the crust’s thinness,
mantle’s ductility and high values of the gravity. [The Internet message]
“The age of the ancient rocks where the carbon a fortiori of the organic
origin was found (in the carbon which ever took part in photosynthesis reaction,
the ratio of isotopes 12C и 13C changes irreversibly)
makes up... 3.8 billion years. We should admit the number is big itself but
there is one more important complementary fact. The point is that Isua formation
in Greenland where this graphitized organic carbon was discovered is at the same
time the most earliest sedimentary rock ever found on Earth. Hence, the first
reliable traces of life on Earth appear together with the first reliable traces
of water”.
That means only one thing – the
life occurred beyond the bounds of the Earth and was brought to our planet
together with meteorites.
[The Internet message] “The
scientists from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the
USA, informed they managed to discover traces of the nonterrestrial life in the
meteorite which fell 31 years ago not far from Melbourne. These are the
fossilized microorganisms which were found in the meteorite which dates 4.6
billion years. The discoverer, the Head of the Astrobiology Department of the
NASA Richard Huver claimed that he had proofs of the presence in the meteorite
of the bacteria cells similar to those found in the Antarctica”.
At once a question arose: how was
life brought onto meteorites? And the question of the meteorites origin.
In order to answer these questions the author tried to imagine logically the
further development of our planet. With the development of the planet, the depth
of its crust-mantle shell constantly grows. Sufficiently developed deep shell of
the planet can restrain the planet’s accretion for some time at the expense of
the growth of the inner strain. This can result in burst and throwing out the
crust-mantle shell. To prove this the
author wants to give an example: the experiment with the cast-iron retort filled
with water which explodes during the fast refrigerating in liquid nitrogen. It
happens because of the inner strain which occurs due to water expansion while
transition from liquid to solid phase. Thereby the crust shell of the planet
which has life appears in space in the form of asteroids and meteorites. The
life on these meteorites after they falls on the young planet’s surface and
waits for the appropriate circumstances necessary for the life’s revival. It
turns out that we are all aliens by origin. Therefore the life in space is
virtually immortal.
Further development of the
crust-mantle shell.
The author regards the
crust-mantle shell of the Earth as a single object which forms as a result of
the natural development of the terrestrial globe. Thus, at the beginning the
crust was very thin and the mantle shell was very hot and ductile which with the
increase of the Earth’s size led to stretching and thinning of the mantle.
That is why the Earth’s surface was covered with plenty of volcanoes which
erupted vast quantities of the volcanic matter. [The Internet message]
“…the primordial atmosphere emerged from gaseous products of the
eruptions; its composition can be studied through the chemical analysis of the
gas samples which are “immured” in the bags of the ancient rocks. The
examined samples which are dated over 3.5 billion years contain about 60% of
carbon dioxide and the rest 40% - are the sulphides (hydrogen sulphide and
sulfur dioxide gas), ammonia as well as hydrogen chloride and anhydrous hydrogen
fluoride. Small amounts of nitrogen and rare gases were also found there”.
Thus, 3.5 billion years ago the whole Earth’s crust consisted of the
sulphur-gneiss rocks.
250 million years after that the
greenstone belts begin to form – (Bibikova and others, 1982)
[4] “ ... The discovery of the plagiogranites dated 3.25 billion years
along the Onot river let the scientists speak for the first time about wide
spreading of the tonalite-trondhjemite associations in the region. The rocks of
the Onot greenstone belt date for the trog linear (paleorift) regions of
spreading of the early sialon tonalite-trondhjemite crust”.

[5] Picture 4. Location of the
nuclears on Earth (according to M.Z.Glukhovsky, H.V.Makarova and others) 1-
nuclears, the numbers are given in the picture and in the table 2, 2 —
internuclear spaces
The Earth’s radius expanded
then up to: R3250 = 6371 - 3250*1.035 = 3007.25 km.
The Earth’s surface area
expanded up to: S3250 = 113.587 million km2.
The dome’s curvature relatively
to the modern Earth’s curvature was:
Sin X = (D0 –D3250)/20000
= (12742 – 6014.5)/20000 =0.3364;
X = 19.66°.
The modern name of these domes
are nuclears (Y.G.Kats and others) [5]. “The emergence of the satellite
photographs on the global generalization level let scientists define unknown
earlier circular formations of huge sizes (several thousands kilometers in
diameter) in the Earth’s lithosphere. The discovery of these formations is
probably connected with the natural generalization of the geological composition
details which are clearly represented on small-scale materials of satellite
photographs. These structures can be traced only within the bounds of the
ancient platforms – the most stable parts of the Earth’s lithosphere.
Originally these circular formations were studied and described in detail by
Soviet geologists E.V.Pavlovsky, M.Z.Glukhov, V.M.Moralev on the example of
Baltic Shield the Siberian platform”, “As a rule, all known nuclears are
rimmed by Precambrian greenstone belts on the outside where they are most
penetrable. They can be found on all Earth’s continents”.
[5] Table 2. Nuclears of the
Earth’s continents
|
Number on the picture
|
Name of the nuclears
|
Maximum axis sizes, km
|
Detection method
|
1.
|
North-American
|
3800
|
G, М, SP
|
2.
|
Colorado
|
2000
|
М, G
|
3.
|
Sveconorwegian
|
900
|
SP, G
|
4.
|
Svecofennian-Karelian
|
1300
|
SP, G
|
5.
|
Kola-Lappis
|
550
|
SP
|
6.
|
Baltic
|
500
|
SP, G
|
7.
|
Scythian (Dnieper)
|
1000
|
M, G
|
8.
|
Sarmatic (Upper Volga)
|
1000
|
М
|
9.
|
Caspian
|
750
|
SP. М, G
|
10.
|
Ob
|
1500
|
SP, М, G
|
11.
|
Kheta-Olenyok
|
1100
|
SP, G, М
|
12.
|
Olenyok
|
500
|
SP, G, М
|
13.
|
Tunguss
|
500
|
SP, G
|
14.
|
Vilyui
|
750
|
SP, G
|
15.
|
Angara
|
900
|
М. SP
|
16.
|
Vitimo-Olekminsk
|
800
|
G, SP
|
17.
|
Aldan-Stanovoy
|
1300
|
G, М, SP
|
18.
|
Amur
|
1400
|
SP, G
|
19.
|
Sino-Korean
|
600
|
G, M
|
20.
|
North-Chinese
|
800
|
G, M
|
21.
|
South-Chinese
|
1200
|
G, M
|
22.
|
Indo-Chinese
|
750
|
G
|
23.
|
Amazon
|
3200
|
М
|
24.
|
West-African
|
3600
|
G
|
25.
|
Arabian-Nubian
|
2200
|
G, SP
|
26.
|
Central-African
|
2800
|
G, SP
|
27.
|
Somali-Arabian
|
1700
|
SP, G
|
28.
|
Tanzanian
|
1400
|
SP, G
|
29.
|
South-African
|
2400
|
SP, G
|
30.
|
Darvar-Mozambiquean-
Pilbara (Pilbara)
|
1700
|
G, SP
|
31.
|
Indo-Australian(North-Australian)
|
2400
|
G
|
32.
|
Yilgarn
|
1200
|
G
|
33.
|
Yuklin (Gawler)
|
1200
|
G
|
* SP — satellite
photographs, G — geological-geophysical and М —
geological-morphological data.
The author has calculated
the areas of the nuclears using the area of a circle formula S = π(D/2)
2, where D – the size of the maximum nuclear’s axis. Solely
calculating North-American nuclear the author had to take into account lack of
the central aperture which size is approximate to the size of the South-Chinese
nuclear.
Ssa =
3.14*(3800/2)2 – 3.14*(1200/2)2 = 10.25 million km2.
Total: the sum of the Earth’s
nuclears areas equals to 73.2 million km2. But in this sum the part
of the nuclears area covered with younger rocks because of their curvature has
not been taken into account. The author believes that correlation of proportions
of the modern continents to their shelves suits for the calculation of the
covered part of nuclears:
149.1 million km2 –
81.6 million km2
73.2 million km2 - SNS
million km2
SNS =
(73.2*81.6)/149.1 = 40.1 million km2
Thus, the total area of the
nuclears is SN = 73.2+40.1 = 113.3 million km2.
The result of the second
verification checkout almost completely coincides with the designed) area S3250
= 113,587 million km2.
This is the area of the Earth’s
surface 3250 million years ago – at the beginning of the greenstone belts
formation.

рис. 5. Fundamental
model of the rift trough
Further expansion of the
Earth’s radius tore and the brittle part of the crust and stretched the
ductile part of the crust and the mantle. Picture 5.
The rifts of the greenstone belts
were formed, they were filled with water, that is why the part of the Earth’s
surface upwelled and stopped depositing sediments. The accumulation of the
sediments started in the rifts of greenstone belts. At the same time the process
of magma extraction from the thinning part of the ductile crust took place.
These processes gradually filled the capacities of rift cracks extracting water
on some new level. The magma extraction process after all led to the
condensation of the newly-formed and early crust. The greenstone belts formed
this way. The process of stretching and condensation also recurred on the
subsequent levels of the Earth’s development. After the change of the several
generations of greenstone belts the Archaean level of evolution was over with
mass occurrence of granite formation 3.0 – 2.5 billion years ago.
The physical nature of
lithospheric plates of old crystal platforms occurrence.
The author has calculated the
time when the sizes of the terrestrial globe amounted to the sizes of the modern
Earth’s outer core:
∆T = 2900/ 1.035 = 2802
million years ago,
where 2900 km – is the depth of
the modern crust-mantle shell.
The radius of the Earth increased
then up to R2802 = 6371 - 2900 = 3471 km.
The Earth’s surface area
increased up to S2802 = 151.32 million km2.
The radius of 3471 km is an
important stage in the Earth’s development because before this radius the
Earth’s outer core and the Earth’s crust increased proportionally at some
point. At the same time the ductile mantle experienced stretching and thinning.
But the temperature transition of the mantle basalts consolidation under high
pressures was on this lower mantle’s border. That means that this is the
border of the mantle’s thermal isolation properties which maintain the
materials of the outer core in liquid state. It follows that later on the outer
core stops growing and it is the mantle and the oceanic crust that grow. Due to
the fact that the lithospheric plates thickness is 220 km approximately and 30
km more of the transition layer (asthenosphere), it is possible to define the
time of the beginning of the constant mantle thickness growth.
Тmantle = 2802
– 250/1.035 = 2560 million years ago.
The Earth’s radius then
expanded up to: R2560 = 6371 - 2560*1.035 = 3721.4 km.
The Earth’s surface area
increased up to: S2560 = 174 million km2.
This is the time of the
lithospheric plates of the crystal platforms exposure. Owning to the fact that
lithospheric plates’ mantle of the old crystal platforms developed during 1.4
billion years by means of stretching and slow increase of depth and that is why
its composition differs from the mantle which began to form 2.56 billion years
ago on the principle of the constant growth. That is why the transition layer
between the old mantle and the younger mantle is not the asthenosphere in
literal meaning. Hence there are no sufficient seismic proofs of the existence
of the asthenosphere under the shields. At the beginning the crust-mantle shell
as if did not notice the change of the principles of the mantle’s growth and
the outer core growth and therefore continued to form the curvature of the
ancient crystal Earth’s surface mechanically. And only 2.5 billion years ago
the final curvature of the crystal platforms was formed.
As for the crust-mantle shell it
had the depth only:
∆Rkm = R2500
– R2802 =3783 – 3471 = 312 km.
Further development of the Earth
continued with the constant mantle’s depth growth, that is why the roots of
the splits were deeper and deeper in the crust-mantle cut.
In the article “The depths of
the Earth – what are they like?” the academician Y.M. Pushcharovsky gives
the results of works done by A.M.Dzivonsky and G.Woodhouse from the Harvard
University. According to the results of the seismic tomography they managed to
make a map of seismic waves transmission anomaly on three levels: 1300, 2300
и 2750 km. “Actually on all levels the low-velocity Pacific area is
prominent. That means that the largest Pacific heterogeneity has very deep root
which almost reach the Earth’s core”.
The author has calculated the
period of the opening of the Paleoasiatic Ocean. The beginning of the opening is
the end of the crystal platform formation, i.e. 2500 million years ago. The
duration of the opening can be calculated through the difference between the
area of the modern continents platforms, the area of the ancient crystal
platforms and the rate of difference rise.
The total area of the modern
continents platforms:
Spk = 149.1 + 81.6 =
230.7 million km2.
The radius can be found:
Rpk = √
(Spk/4π) = 4 286 km
∆ Rpk = 4 286
– 3783 = 503 km
∆T = 503/1.035 = 486
million years
or 2500 – 486 = 2014 million
years ago.
The opening of the Paleoasiatic
Ocean was in fact the leaf opening of the crust-mantle shell of the Earth’s
northern hemisphere.
“Endogenous activity is
periodic. It set conditions for the presence of the Earth’s large pulses with
the alternate predominance of the magmatism which fixes stretching and the
volcanism which fixes the predominance of condensation. This periodicity defines
the presence of magmatic and tectonic cycles”.
In reality two levels of the same
process are understood under the term “pulse”. They are the crust-mantle
opening and the filling of the opened troughs of the rifts under the pressure,
moreover, the effect of condensation of the old and new crust takes place while
filling the troughs. That is why the mountains in Asia continue to grow.
2014 years ago the multilevel
leaf opening of the crust-mantle shell of the Earth’s southern hemisphere
started.
The global asymmetry of Earth is
well-defined on the terrestrial globe and on the tectonic world map by the clear
isolation of continental and oceanic hemispheres. Then the question arises: why
is the ocean floor maximum age not more than 180 million years? The explanation
is simple. The two processes take place simultaneously: stretching and the
opening of the crust and the filling of troughs by basalts. That is why the
rift’s age should not necessarily coincide with the rift’s floor age.
According to the conclusion made by the academician Y.M Pushcharovsky – “The
Earth is characterized by its global structural heterogeneity. Two segments can
be differed in its bounds: one of them, which includes the Pacific Ocean and the
Pacific tectonic belt rimming it, is characterized by the high degree of
mobility and penetrability of the tectonosphere. In the other segment all
ancient platforms dividing their geosynclinal-folded belts and secondary oceans
are situated. It follows from this opposition that two parts should be developed
by different ways for a very long time”.

Picture 6 (Khain V.E.) [6] the
curve of the elevations and depths distribution (а) generalized
profile of the ocean’s floor
In the picture 6 the thrust of
the newly formed oceanic crust on the lithospheric continental plate can be seen
clearly. The
conventional model of the plates tectonics – the spreading of the oceanic
lithosphere takes place due to the rise of the basalt magma which is molted from
the mantle. Convection flows carry lithospheric plates apart and draw them back
into the mantle [2] picture 7.

Picture 7
The model of the accretive Earth
according to the author’s conception.
Picture 8. Form the picture it
can be seen that the two processes take place simultaneously: the Earth’s
accretion and filling the formed capacities by basalt. In that connection the
filling continues in the following ways: the first – due to extracting of the
oceanic crust upward in the whole and the second – due to extracting of the
basalt through the mid-oceanic ranges.

Picture 8
The first is the main process of
the filling (the Pacific Ocean and the Pacific tectonic belt rimming it). And
thanks to the second process the oceanic floor is renewed. The most interesting
thing is that these processes in the history of the Earth’s development
already took place during the Paleoasian ocean’s opening. In Picture 3 it can
be seen that the repeating oncoming oceanic crust thrust created orogenes along
the continental slope.
The melting of the mantle’s
edge of the continental lithosphere takes place along the border of the oceanic
asthenosphere and the mantle of the continental lithosphere. Besides, the lower
from the Earth’s surface the higher the temperature of the asthenosphere and
the more melted the continental lithosphere mantle’s edge. The cut of the
downhole seismic tomography shows that the division between the continental
mantle and the oceanic asthenosphere traces up to 2800 km depths. (E.E.Milanovsky)
[7] “The results of the latest seismo-tomographic researches which let us
radiograph the Earth’s interior right up to the core surface showed that there
is the upper mantle under all spreading belts and under some of them there is a
lower mantle or its upper part which are characterized by abnormally low (for
the corresponding depths) velocities of the seismic waves transmitting. It
denotes of the reduced density and the increased temperatures which let us
suggest that there are ascending streams of warmth and depth material under
these belts.”
Conclusion: The
proper conception about the terrestrial globe evolution is of a great
importance not only for Geology but for all science in general. Due to the fact
that the Earth is a cosmic object, the right conception of the Earth’s
evolution gives us the key to understanding the laws of the stars and Galaxies
development. It is very opportunely nowadays because the problems of the dark
matter and the dark energy occurred due to the wrong conception of the central
part of the Galaxy by physics. The modern physics does not consider the core of
the Galaxy - Galaxy-generating and that is why it can not answer the seemingly
simple question – why don’t the spiral arms of Galaxies fly away?
Literature:
- Monitoring and forecasting
of the geophysical processes. Shelf-slope. Internet library.
- Children’s encyclopedia.
Geology. Moscow “AVANTA+” 1995.
- W. Kerry “In Search of the
mechanism of the Earth’s and the Universe development”, Moscow, Mir, 1991,
pages 162, 290
- Bibikova E.V., Khilyatova V.Y., Gracheva T.V.
and others, The age of the greenstone belts of Prisayanie, Reports of the
Academy of Science of the USSR, 267, (5), 1171-1174, 1982.
- Kats Y.G., Poletaev A.I.,
Sulidi-Kondratyev E.D. Circular structures of the planet’s face.
- Academician
of the Russian Academy of Sciences V.E. Khain “Strengths which created the
unique look of our planet”.
- Academician
of the Russian Academy of Sciences Е. Е. Milanovsky
“Riftogenesis and its role in the Earth’s development”.
Publishing date: July 23, 2007
Source: SciTecLibrary.ru
Back
|