© A. Rudnev, (doctor physico-mathematical sciences)

Contact: rudnev@orc.ru

What is a new conception of Physics needed for? It is not an easy question to answer, and we have to ask for the reader’ attention. Long ago Physics became a standard of correctness among the other sciences, it is Physics that determines a lot of rules and laws, many of which are considered to be the rules and laws of Chemistry, Philosophy, etc., rather than of Physics. In other words, Physics is a peculiar measuring instrument which is used by the rest of the sciences.

Everybody knows how vigilantly the metrological standards are watched over. It is impossible to imagine that such an instrument is used as a hammer – it can be deformed! But there is no supervisor to be liable for the correctness of Physics.

One can ask a reasonable question: “Is Physics wrong? Should it be corrected?” Just imagine a crooked ruler with effaced scale, moreover, sewn at the breakage point. What can be measured with such an instrument? The result of the measurement is sure to contain a lot of corrections – in a certain range one should add something to the length, in another one, multiply it by a factor, etc. Thus a crooked ruler brings about various effects which must be taken into consideration and eliminated. And vice versa: if the results of your measurements brings about effects, than the ruler is crooked!

Now, reader, glance at Physics and count how many various effects it does comprise! Each effect is a defect of the rules and laws of Physics. It is obvious that all the defects are hidden in a system of viewpoints on the Physics, that is, in the conception of the viewpoints.

Terrorists love to deal with the unprotected objects. The same way the unprotected Physics absorbed not only a great number of errors, but also the theory of relativity as “a planted bomb”. It is next to impossible for a common person to legitimate a law of Physics. But such a hazardous hypothesis, in which time and space were mixed up as a medley, was accepted easily from “a terrorist”. And not only the void of vacuum is adopted, but also a photon introduced as a mediator for transfer of power. The basis of Physics which prohibited the promotion of the absurd theory was proclaimed not valid in microcosm.

It is therefore no surprise that followed after that was the era of stagnation has been reigning in Physics. There has been no progress over the last half-century (all this provided enormous technological development!).

The majority of scientific researches are intrinsically doomed to failure because there is not a single branch left of the Physics thesaurus that would not be contaminated. The scientists introduce those viruses into their researches unintentionally thus depreciating the value of the results. It is impossible to start correcting Physics without changing the entire system of notions.

The situation is not beyond hope, for the major part of Physics that produces effects is microcosm. And here we deal with such a blank spot as the electron, which according to the theory of relativity, can not be structured. The lame excuse of such a statement is the alleged elementary nature of the electron. The hidden reason of this is that a structured electron would not be a material particle, and its periphery would exceed the velocity of light.

Nowadays, we attempt erecting a building out of the bricks (electrons) without knowing and without investigating their essence. Guess the future of such a building!

Einstein invented the correct formula: and at the same time he defiled it having defined the velocity of the electron equal to the velocity of light. To account for the kinetic energy of the electron being, Einstein had to introduce a new lie “the rest energy” of the electron, allegedly pertinent to the electron in a rest state. It entailed the introduction of another lie, the notion of “the rest mass” (which is quite common – one lie causes another one). And he managed to get away with that as well – up till now this very “rest mass” is commonly accepted.

Let's think of the generality of the following equations:

• the energy of a condenser ;

• the energy of an inductance ;

• the energy of translation ;

• the energy of the rotation

.

It is not by chance that these look like halves of the total energy.

So the question arises: Where are the second halves? Have you thought it over? The answer is quite plain: In the environment. The energy of a condenser is produced due displacement of the charge (with respect to the environment), the energy of an inductance is produced by the magnetic effect of the relative motion of the charges (also with respect to the environment). The kinetic energy of the motion is produced by the acceleration of a body with respect to a certain fulcrum which has accepted thesecond half, the reactive energy.

If the energy of the electron is actually equal to, then the electron is a non-simple, non-elementary STRUCTURE, able to keep its reactive energy within its own reference frame. Then, the velocity of the electron has nothing to do with the velocity of light for in such a case the second part of the energy would have to belong to an external source of energy.

And finally: Energy is MOTION. Motion and rest are alternative categories because motion means life, rest means death. The absolute logic truth is that the rest energy (hence, the rest mass) is nonsense.

Strange as it may seem, but the Lord gave us the electron with the parameter of energy equivalent to mass. Thus it is quite correct to express the mass in the units of energy, and vice versa, the energy can be expressed in the units of mass. Mass to energy equivalent is J/kg. This holds only at the room temperature, because the energy of everything existing goes down to zero at the temperature of the absolute zero. So the found value of the equivalent is the product of the absolute equivalent by the current temperature in Kelvin. Then, if the temperature is Т=293° К, the absolute mass to energy equivalent is J/kg^.deg. It is obvious that at the acceleration of an electron from an external source of energy, the electron energy increases

(1)

and could considerably exceed the initial value. Another corollary is that nothing prevents an electron from being at rest, which confirms the existence of the internal motion within an electron, actualizing its energy.

It is quite clear that the energy of the electron set forth as its permanent characteristics is an average value over a certain period (energy is power multiplied by time). In other words, the energetic parameters of the electron reflect the oscillatory process. The same result is achieved when we try to actualize the energy of a particle of the given mass. Indeed, the translation and rotation motion at a constant velocity actualize only the half of the energy. Then the only way to actualize it is the mass spinning around its own axis, which means alternate acceleration. (By the way, such an energy mass can get the acceleration only relatively to the particles similar to itself. Hence, the electron can't be borne alone; they are produced in a large quantity, probably, by means of explosion).

So, the energy mass (EM) inside an electron can be imagined as a ball. Then such a ball would be only able to actualize its energy as the spinning energy

(2).

An immediate contact with the environment means considerable losses of energy. EM attempts to actualize a more economic motion, the rotary one. Continuing spinning around its own axis (Fig. 1a), it begins oscillating in the perpendicular direction (Fig. 1b).

The centrifugal forces make the oscillation radius r grow. Below we will discuss the reasons of the radius value's stabilization at the level of r_e (Fig. 1 c). The angular oscillations of EM will also stabilize

(3).

The energy of oscillation is expressed through the moment of inertia of EM and angular acceleration

(4),

that is why analytically it is alternating. Actually this energy is acquired from the spinning energy of EM, so it can only be evaluated numerically (Fig. 2).

However, the initial energy (2) of the EM spinning is a constant value, so it would be impossible to employ its reduction for producing oscillations. The big EM inertia allows changing of the energetic state only harmonically. The harmonization of the energy of oscillation (Fig. 3) is only achieved through substitution of the function with the function

(5).

The energy of rotation according to the residual principle is

(6).

(For clarity reasons, the unit of the energy of the electron is assumed to be unity).

According to the equation (4), the reduction of the momentary values of the energy in time can be only achieved by the modulation of the oscillation radius.

That is how the process of a specific shaping of the electron occurs. From the expanded equation (4)

(5)

the value of the radius of the electron is found

(6).

Fig. 4 shows the scaled diagram of this function and the shape of the profile of the trajectory of the EM inside the electron (on the right).

The actualization of the energy (5) of EM spinning around its own axis causes the variable value of the angular velocity

(7),

being the radius of EM inside the electron equal to 2.55137017634638E-17 m.

(See the derivation at http://radon.boom.ru/)

The function (9) is shown in the Fig. 5.

The graph clearly demonstrates alternation of the EM spinning directions over a period of oscillation. Since the energy E_rot has a constant component, the moments of W (t) transition through zero are also located asymmetrically with respect to the EM phase of oscillation. The result of this asymmetry is another mystery of the electron, the orbital EM rotation.

The angle rotary acceleration of the EM

(8)

constitutes short bursts of energy (Fig. 6).

Two opposite polar impulses have the average zero value but a non-zero action over a period of time. Impulses, as seen in the Fig. 6, are distant from the moment of by different values (the phase shifts) D j ₁ and D j _{2 .} And this, according to the Fig. 4, means differening values of the radius r(j ). So for the first time the reasons for the orbital rotation of the EM have been found.

Back