 |
Scientific News Philosofy Human life VANISHED INCA MAY HAVE USED BINARY CODE LANGUAGE
VANISHED INCA MAY HAVE USED BINARY
CODE LANGUAGE
|

|
|
The Inca may have used khipu knotes such as
these as a form of writing (Pic: Marcia and Robert Ascher)
|
The vanished Inca civilisation of the Andes,
long thought to have no writing, invented a seven-bit binary code to store
information more than 500 years before the invention of the computer, argues an
American anthropologist.
Begun in the Andean highlands of Chile and Colombia around 1200 AD, the Inca
ruled the largest empire on Earth by the time their last emperor, Atahualpa, was
garroted by Spanish conquistadors in 1533.
But the voice of the Inca has never been heard; it has long been considered the
only major Bronze Age civilisation without a written language.
Professor Gary Urton, an anthropologist at Harvard
University in Boston and a specialist in Pre-Columbian
studies, is now challenging that assumption in a new book, Signs of the Inka
Khipu. He argues the Incas had a written language disguised in the form of
elaborate knotted strings known as khipu.
Derived from the word for 'knot' in the Quechuan language of the Inca - still
widely spoken in the the Andes highlands - these decorative objects consist of
one main cord to which are attached several pendant strings. These, which can
carry subsidiary or tertiary strings, bear clusters of knots.
In 1923, science historian L. Leland Locke proved that the khipu were more than
decorative; they were a sort of textile abacus, their knots used to record
calculations.
But Locke's rules decoded only a small percentage of the existing 600 khipu that
survived the Spanish destruction, failing to take into account even one-half of
the total information encoded in them, Urton said.
"The most convincing evidence for this three-dimensional writing system is
the khipu. Their complexity would have been unnecessary if they were just
mnemonic devices understood only by their makers," Urton said.
In the book, published by the University of Texas Press, Urton has for the first
time systematically analyses the khipu's essential elements. It emerged that
there are seven points in making a khipu, where the maker chooses between two
possibilities.
The binary choices include the type of material (cotton or wool), the spin and
ply direction of the string, the direction (forward or reversed) of the knot,
and so on. A strict seven-bit code would produce 128 permutations (or 27).
But Urton calculates that there were 24 possible colours that could be used in
khipu making.
Thus the khipu code can store 1,536 units of information (26,
multiplied by 24). This is comparable to the Sumerian cuneiform symbols used
between 1000 AD and 1500 AD, and more than twice the Egyptian and Maya
hieroglyphic signs.
A definitive way to crack the intractable code would be the discovery of what
Urton calls a 'Rosetta khipu', something similar to the deciphering of Egyptian
hieroglyphics from the Rosetta stone: a basalt slab unearthed in Egypt in 1799
with text in Greek and Egyptian hieroglyphs, allowing linguists to decode the
language.
"We have a sizeable number of khipu, and we have about a dozen documents
that are written up from the khipu. What we don't have yet is a match between a
document and a khipu," said Urton.
While searching, Urton is attacking the khipu code with 21st century technology,
creating a database packed with any possible data on each khipu: length of the
main string, number of pendants, details on the knots, spin, ply of each string,
and so on, in order to search for common patterns.
"Just 10 days ago, I discovered three khipu that share part of the
information," he said. "This is a pretty strong evidence that they
were not made by single people. On the contrary, there was a shared code."
"It is an interesting study," said Professor Laura Laurencich-Minelli,
a specilaist in Pre-Columbian studies at Bologna
University and author of several books on the Inca and
the khipu. "Certainly, khipu were much more than mnemonic devices."
Source of the given news and the copyrights
belong to a ABC
Online News
Publishing date: July 8, 2003
Back
|  |