 |
Scientific News Natural Cataclysm Cycle of matter ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY HAS DECLINED - BUT WHY?
ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY HAS DECLINED
-- BUT WHY?
The amount of gaseous mercury in the atmosphere
has dropped sharply from its peak in the 1980s and has remained relatively
constant since the mid 1990s. This welcome decline may result from control
measures undertaken in western Europe and North America, but scientists who have
just concluded a study of atmospheric mercury say they cannot reconcile the
amounts actually found with current understanding of natural and manmade sources
of the element.
An international group of scientists, led
by Franz Slemr of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry [Max-Planck-Institut
fuer Chemie] in Mainz, Germany, studied the worldwide trend of total gaseous
mercury at six sites in the northern hemisphere, two sites in the southern
hemisphere, and on eight ship transatlantic ship cruises since 1977. They have
published their findings in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American
Geophysical Union.
The fixed sites ranged from the Canadian Arctic
to Antarctica. In both hemispheres, total gaseous mercury increased in the late
1970s, apparently peaked in the late 1980s, decreased to a minimum in the mid
1990s, and has remained relatively constant since then. Concentrations in the
southern hemisphere are about one-third less than in the northern hemisphere.
These observations accord well, the researchers say, with data on mercury
deposited in peat bogs and found in ice cores.
Scientists have believed that natural processes
and human activities put about equal amounts of mercury into the atmosphere.
Assuming that natural emissions and re-emissions of the historically deposited
mercury have remained constant, the observed reduction of about 17 percent in
concentration from 1990 to 1996 would have to result from a reduction of about
34 percent in manmade emissions during that period. This, the scientists say, is
three to four times larger than the 10 percent decrease in manmade emissions
suggested by previous studies. Therefore, either our understanding of manmade
emissions or of the ratio of natural to manmade emissions probably has to be
refined, they say.
The level of atmospheric mercury is important,
even though at current levels, it is not directly toxic. The problem, says Slemr,
"is that some 5,000 metric tons of atmospheric mercury are currently
deposited worldwide every year. The atmospheric lifetime of elemental mercury is
about one year and, thus, the mercury is deposited even in remote areas."
Further, Slemr says, some of the atmospheric
mercury is deposited into soil and water, where it can be "transformed to
methyl mercury, one of the most toxic compounds." In ocean water, methyl
mercury concentrates in plankton and further accumulates in fish, especially
those high in the food chain, such as tuna. High methyl mercury levels in tuna
can lead to chronic diseases in persons who eat the fish, with pregnant women
most in danger.
Therefore, the researchers say, it is essential
that we better understand the amount and sources of mercury in the atmosphere.
The amount of mercury emitted naturally is not well understood at present. With
regard to manmade emissions, coal burning definitely emits mercury, and it was
recently discovered that biomass burning is another important source. Waste
incineration is also a source, but not yet well quantified. Further, says Slemr,
the annual re-emission of a small fraction of the 200,000 metric tons of mercury
deposited into the environment since Roman times is uncertain.
Slemr and his colleagues conclude that future
emission inventories must take into account the difference between atmospheric
mercury levels in the northern and southern hemispheres, as well as the historic
and present day emission trends. Further research will be necessary with regard
to the quantitative and qualitative sources of atmospheric mercury, both natural
and manmade, for any emission inventory to be credible.
###
The study was funded in part by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft.
Contact: Harvey Leifert, hleifert@agu.org,
202-777-7507, American
Geophysical Union
Source of the given news and the copyrights
belong to a American
Geophysical Union
Publishing date: June 24, 2003
Back
|  |