 |
Scientific News Philosofy Where we go? U.S. AND THE U.N. AT WAR OVER SUGAR GUIDELINES
U.S. AND THE U.N. AT WAR OVER
SUGAR GUIDELINES
The United States has accused the United
Nations food and health bodies of failing to get their science right in a report
that calls for limiting sugar intake for health reasons.
The 150 page report, launched jointly by the U.N. World
Health Organisation (WHO) and Food
and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) this week,
was compiled by a team of 75 independent experts as part of a strategy to
improve health by encouraging people to eat more fruit and vegetables, limit
sugar to no more than 10 percent of the energy in a diet, and exercise
moderately.
However, following the release of the report, the U.S. ambassador to the food
and agriculture agencies, Tony Hall, handed out a statement which read: "I
believe that the WHO/FAO report falls short of presenting the comprehensive body
of evidence and rigorous conclusions necessary to serve as a basis for WHO and
FAO policy recommendations," it said.
"Unfortunately, this report has never even been an item for discussion
among the member countries," he added in a statement. "The concerns
expressed by many of my colleagues from the developing world serve to remind us
of the importance of getting the science right."
U.N. officials have stood by the research: "The report contains the best
currently available scientific evidence on the relationship of diet, nutrition
and physical activity to chronic diseases," said WHO director-general Gro
Harlem Brundtland.
She told diplomats at the Rome headquarters of the FAO that the burden of
chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes and
obesity, is rapidly increasing worldwide. In 2001, they contributed almost 60
percent of the 56.5 million total reported deaths in the world and 46 percent of
the global burden of disease, according to the Geneva-based WHO.
The report concludes that a diet low in saturated fats, sugars and salt, and
high in vegetables and fruits, together with regular physical activity, will
have a major impact on combating this high toll of death and disease.
"Simple messages are required -- less high-calorie foods, more fruits,
vegetables and legumes, more foods of plant and marine origin -- plus people
need to be physically active," FAO director-general Jacques Diouf told the
assembly.
The report originally published last week has triggered a sharp reaction from
the powerful U.S. Sugar Association and other food industry groups which contest
limits on the amount of sugar to be added to soft drinks, sauces, biscuits and
burgers, as recommended by the report.
The Sugar Association labelled the WHO report misguided and dubious, and claimed
it had ignored recent scientific findings that sugar was not a causative factor
in obesity, diabetes, heart disease, hyperactivity and dental caries.
Pressure on the WHO to prevent the report being published has been heavier even
than anything seen from the tobacco industry in the past, according to press
reports, including a threat to withdraw the United States $406 million dollars
contribution to the WHO.
The Sugar Association argues the report misleads the public to believe there is
a health risk in consuming more than 10 percent of an individual's daily energy
intake from added sugars, and points to a National Academy of Sciences study
that gives more liberal guidelines for sugar intake.
However Diouf said the report's recommendation on sugar consumption had been
taken out of context: "I believe the experts (authors) themselves would
agree that this recommendation is not meant to be a precise quantitative limit
derived from scientific experiments, but the best compromise based on current
knowledge," he said.
"The recommendation to limit the intake of free sugars is meant to be a
desirable population nutrition goal, not a standard to be regulated."
He said the report would be submitted to the governing bodies of FAO for further
discussion and comment.
Brundtland told Reuters: "I don't think there is good reason for the
criticism. There are 25 countries that have issued dietary guidelines using the
10 percent figure."
Nutritional scientist Dr Katrine Baghurst, of Australia's Commonwealth
Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation, told ABC Science Online that
setting guidelines for sugar was a "balancing act" that takes into
consideration scientific studies and cultural information on what sorts of food
people commonly eat. Current draft Australian dietry guidelines advise people to
eat only moderate amounts of sugar.
Source of the given news and the copyrights
belong to a ABC
Online News
Publishing date: May 13, 2003
Back
|  |