 |
Scientific News Health care Other illnesses and advices NEW STUDY FINDS VASECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE PROSTATE CANCER RISK
NEW STUDY FINDS VASECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE
PROSTATE CANCER RISK
Contrary to some earlier studies, a new study
funded in part by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
found that men who undergo vasectomies are no more likely to develop prostate
cancer than are men who do not.
"About one out of six American men over the
age of 35 has had a vasectomy," said Duane Alexander, M.D., director of the
NICHD. "The results of this study are reassuring since they indicate that
these men are no more likely than other men to get prostate cancer."
The study, by Brian Cox, M.B., Ph.D. and
colleagues, appears in the current issue of the Journal of the American Medical
Association. Prostate cancer is a leading form of cancer among men in the United
States, second only to skin cancer. Although there is no biological explanation
why vasectomy might be associated with an increased prostate cancer risk, a few
studies conducted in the United States in the early 1990s reported a moderately
increased risk of prostate cancer among men who underwent vasectomy. Several
other studies have found no increased risk of prostate cancer among vasectomized
men. However, despite this conflicting evidence, urologists have been concerned
enough to increase prostate cancer screening of vasectomized men and to
discourage vasectomies in men with a family history of prostate cancer.
The current study was conducted in New Zealand, a
country considered ideal to examine any possible connection between vasectomy
and prostate cancer because, according to the authors, it has both the highest
vasectomy prevalence in the world and mandatory reporting of all new cancer
cases. The researchers interviewed over 2,200 men. Almost half of the
participants were newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. The remaining
participants were randomly selected from the adult male population and did not
have prostate cancer. All participants were between the ages of 40 and 74 and
had been married at some time. The men were interviewed by telephone and asked
about previous illnesses, vasectomy, smoking and alcohol consumption, prostate
specific antigen (PSA) testing, rectal examination, previous urological symptoms,
family history of cancer, and socio-demographic characteristics.
Vasectomized men were no more likely to have
prostate cancer than those who had not had a vasectomy. Furthermore, according
to the study's authors, "Adjustment for social class, geographic region,
religious affiliation, and a family history of prostate cancer, had little
effect on the relative risk of prostate cancer from vasectomy." The study
also found that there was no increased risk of prostate cancer among men who had
vasectomies 25 or more years before they were interviewed.
"Since vasectomy is so common in New Zealand
and all new prostate cancers there must be reported to its National Cancer
Registry, that's where you would expect to find a link between the two, if one
exists" said Steven Kaufman, M.D., of NICHD's Contraception and
Reproductive Health Branch. "Also, although the study was more than large
enough to detect an increased prostate cancer risk associated with vasectomy,
none was found."
###
The NICHD is part of the National
Institutes of Health, the biomedical research arm of the federal government. The
Institute sponsors research on development, before and after birth; maternal,
child, and family health; reproductive biology and population issues; and
medical rehabilitation. NICHD publications, as well as information about the
Institute, are available from the NICHD Web site, http://www.nichd.nih.gov/,
or from the NICHD Clearinghouse, 1-800-370-2943; e-mail NICHDClearinghouse@mail.nih.gov.
Contact:
Susan Marsiglia or Bob Bock, rb96a@nih.gov,
301-496-5133
NIH/National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Source of the given news and the copyrights
belong to a NIH/National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Publishing date: June 25, 2002
Back
|  |