Russian version

Home page

Search:

For contact - E-mail


Articles and Publication
Articles and Publication    Physics    Physical mechanics THE METHOD OF THERMO-MECHANICAL PROCESSES IN A SET OF BARS ASSUMING ELASTIC AND FRICTIONAL JOINTS

 

THE METHOD OF THERMO-MECHANICAL PROCESSES IN A SET OF BARS ASSUMING ELASTIC AND FRICTIONAL JOINTS

 

 

 

© Eugenij P. Firsanov, Ph.D.

Contact to the author: mail-fire@yandex.ru

 

In the article we consider the set rectilinear bars lying in a plane that are fixed at one side. The bars are coupled mechanically by inter-bar elastic joints. Two adjacent bars are frictionally joined assuming the frictional sliding possibility. Thermo-mechanical processes mean changes of axial shifts, forces and deformations (strains) of bars occurring due to bar temperature alterations. We study the solution for “heating-cooling” cycle problem given aforementioned elastic and frictional joints and bar frictional sliding. The suggested method of research has been used to investigate thermo-mechanical processes on the stator of turbo-generator happening under temperature changes of main components.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

The system of differential equations is used to research thermo-mechanical processes happening under temperature changes of a set of rectilinear mechanically coupled bars lying in a plane. We consider n-bar model shown on figure 1.

 

 

 

Figure 1. The n-bar model

Initial assumptions:

  1. The bars are fixed at one base (x = 0); at the other base they are tied by the elastic joints () to the shared plate A which can move along x without turning and deformation.
  2. Each bar is given by heating temperature (θj), the (linear expansion) thermal extension coefficient (αj), the cross sectional area (Fj) , the longitudinal rigidity (Gj) and the elastic joint rigidity ().
  3. The bars are coupled by inter-bar elastic joints () evenly distributed along the bar.
  4. The bar with j = 1 and j = 2 are evenly lengthwise frictionally joined with the linear friction coefficient τ.
  5. The mechanical parameters (Gj, , τ) and heating temperatures (θj) are constant (over x axis) for each bar; Gj = EFj, where E is the elastic modulus.
  6. The right move is stated positive.

Let us denote:

l +– the bar length; m;

l = const;

–the vector of bars shifts at coordinate x; m;

– the vector of elastic joint shifts between bars at coordinate x; m;

w – the axial shift of the plate A; m;

– the vector of axial forces in the bars at coordinate x; N;

, when the bar is stretched;

the vector of axial strains in the bars at coordinate x;

, ; N;

; 1/° C

; ° C;

τ – the linear friction coefficient; N/m

– the coefficient of evenly distributed elastic joint between bars j and j+1; N/m2;

– the coefficient of elastic joint of bar j to the plate A; N/m

, ;

– the additional force of the special spring element if installed between the bar end and the plate A; N.

The relation between force changes and shifts of the bars under temperature changes are given by two differential equations describing the relative lengthenings of elementary bar portions and the inter-bar balance condition for these portions.

j = 1, n;

(1)

The following boundary conditions must be satisfied.

The absence of bar shifts at x = 0 is given by

. (2)

The condition of deformation of elastic elements at bar ends is given by

; . (3)

Assuming the possibility of rigid bar joint to the plate A, this boundary condition is rewritten as

(4)

where the if and in the rigid joint case. We set in the latter case as well.

Finally, the balance condition for the plate A is given by

. (5)

Now let's exclude the vector v(x) from the equation (1). The elastic joint shifts v(x) are a consequent to the bar frictional sliding.

(6)

As only the j=1 bar can slide, we get:

.

So it is enough to exclude the v1(x) function.

The function v1(x) differs from the function u1(x) at the points where the frictional sliding took place, namely:

a) If the frictional sliding happens under given heating conditions in some area x, then ; (7)

where τ > 0 when the first bar the slides to the right i.e. v1(x)> u2(x).

b) Otherwise, when there is no frictional sliding under given heating conditions, the function representing the frictional sliding value under previous heating conditions remains constant

; (8)

So a) and b) imply the differential equation can be written as:

or (9)

and the latter form doesn't contain unknown function v1(x).

Thus the problem is defined up to the initial function provided that following values are given: the frictional sliding area, i.e. the sliding area start coordinate γ (), and the sign of the friction force τ in the equations (in other words the slide direction). Later we demonstrate how to determine these values.

The detailed analysis of shifts and forces under heating and cooling shows that if initially ≡ 0, then the most important case, the “heating-cooling” cycle calculation given the initial state, results in two problems with the initial condition ≡ 0 and the heatings vectors .

The first problem – with the heating vector and the initial boundary conditions (possibly inhomogeneous). The second problem – with the heating vector, homogeneous boundary conditions and doubled friction force. The “heating-cooling” cycle solution comes as superposition of solutions of these two problems if the slide area for the second task doesn't exceed that of the first task.

Let's demonstrate this. Assuming ≡ 0 at the initial state, we examine two consecutive thermal states given by the heatings vectors . Under the state the first bar moves to the right at the slide area coordinate . Under the state the bar moves to the left with the new slide area coordinate .

For each state we denote by and the solution of corresponding problem. Now let's find out which equations are satisfied by the below functions

.

Observing the linearity of equations (1), we can write

j = 1,…,n ; (10)

, j = 3,…,n.

And so we need to research only ( is similar).

Examining the equations separately for each interval (0, γ1), (γ1, γ2), (γ2, l) we have:

for (0, γ1) where the slide didn't happen

; (11)

for (γ1, γ2)

thus . (12)

While the slide shift function is given by

and writing (1) the heating state

. (13)

We get that (11) holds on (γ1, γ2) as well.

For (γ2, l) we have

, , whence . (14)

So summing up the above the function Q1(x) satisfies equation (11) on the interval (0, γ2 ) and (14) on (γ2, l).

The condition (3) takes the form

. (15)

Evidently the boundary conditions (2), (3) and (5) are satisfied. The proof is completed.

Similar reasoning could be employed for the series of heating states, however it would require the complicated algorithm for calculating the slide area boundaries for each successive calculation.

Below we try to solve the (1) in the form (9) assuming ≡0.

By γ we denote the slide area start coordinate. The elementary bar portions balance condition equation takes the form of:

if

if

 

 

(16)

Basing on the above the equations (1) can be rewritten in matrix form:

   (17)

if

if

where ,

,

,                                             

,                                                     

                                                                                                        

Similarly the boundary conditions are:

(19)

where

, I – is the unitary matrix.

Additionally the solution must be continuous at γ:

. (20)

Thus we've got the system of ordinary linear differential equations with constant coefficients on two adjacent intervals (0, γ), (γ, l).

Instead of Q(x) we will examine the following functions:

.

The solutions of the LDE system can be represented as the matrix exponent [1]

if ;

(21)

if ;

where

In our case the matrix exponent R and the matrix P have the following form:

,

(22)

,

and

.

where are the diagonal matrices of eigenvalues

, ;

Z, V are the eigenvector matrices from the generalized eigenvalue problem,

, ;

; 23)

.

The matrices in (22) are well-defined as the generalized eigenvalue problem has the complete G – orthonormal system of eigenvectors.

Usually the matrices are not used in fractions as they don't commute. However as the diagonal matrices commute, the matrix fractions are correctly defined and corresponding formulates are easier to read.

If some of the eigenvalues , are zero then the corresponding fractions in the generalized solution (21, 1.22) can be obtained calculating the limits

, , , . (24)

The formulas (19) and (20) result in the system of linear algebraic equations in w, u(l), Q(l). The solvability of the system is proved by the completeness and the consistency of the boundary conditions (out of the scope of the article).

In order to solve the eigenvalue problem we observe that M·K·M* is the 3-diagonal symmetric nonnegative-definite matrix.

The effective algorithms for finding the eigenvalues of generalized eigenvalue problem for such matrices are well known; for example the bisection method [2]. The corresponding eigenvectors are calculated by simple recurrent formulas.

So far we've constructed the solution to the problem given by equations (17) – (20) assuming the frictional joints between the first and the second bars and the first bar frictional sliding. Now let’s show how to determine the frictional sliding area start coordinate γ and the sign of the friction force τ in the equations (in other words the frictional sliding direction).

The frictional sliding at x happens if

, where (25)

and the sign of τ is defined as sign(τ) = sign(Δ) (26)

The coordinate γ can be determined by the method of successive approximations - changing the γ from l to 0 until

or γ = 0 .

As it was mentioned, it is relatively difficult to find u(x), Q(x) from the differential equations when there is series of heating conditions. It is also known that differential equations with variable coefficients (to account the fact the mechanical parameters are unevenly distributed along the bars) and arbitrary right-hand sides (temperature, friction) are harder to solve. The finite difference method is used in practice to overcome the above mentioned difficulties.

The suggested method of research of thermo-mechanical processes was used to investigate the effect of “heating-cooling” cycles on the stator of turbo-generator. The analysis of turbo-generators operation as well as a number of experimental results showed that “heating-cooling” cycles may threat the stator winding, core and their fastening details under certain heating conditions because of the thermo mechanical processes in stator in question.

It was discovered that axial shifts of the winding and the core under heating and cooling should be calculated accounting the mechanical joints between each other and other elements of stator by the method described above instead of well-known formulas of free thermal expansion of copper and steel.

The 4-bars model of stator was chosen for numerical experiment assuming that:

  • the bars represent the stator elements (winding, core teeth and body; keybars) that are mechanically tied with each other by longitudinally distributed elastic joints () and tied at their ends to stator pressure plates by elastic joints (),
  • both mechanical parameters and temperatures are evenly circumferentially distributed,
  • the longitudinally distributed friction joints are between the winding and core teeth in the slot areas,
  • the stator is symmetrical relative to the center so that both sides can be examined separately.

The effect of mechanical parameters and “heating-cooling” cycles on calculation results was analyzed. The computation results for some turbo-generators were compared with the direct measurements of certain parameters as shown by diagrams on figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2. The distribution of thermo-mechanical strains (z) along the tooth end zone when heating the winding bar; L is distance from the tooth end; [3] The calculations results are denoted by ―õ― and ―î―; the measurements are denoted by ●

Figure 3. The distribution of relative axial deformation of keybar εp(x)/εp(0) along the keybar end area (x) for different keybar-to-core elastic joint coefficients (Kp) [4]; 1 – Êð = 0,17× 1010 N/m2 (min), 6 – Kp =17× 1010 N/m2 (max), 7 – Kp = 0 (no joint); x is the distance from keybar end; the measurements are denoted by î , D with unscrewed tensioning nuts and by ● with tightened tensioning nuts.

 

The computations showed that the friction joints between the winding and core teeth cause the pressure growth in teeth ends when the stator winding is heating up and the pressure decrease when the stator winding cools down. The reverse phenomenon is observed at subsequent areas along the teeth − the pressure decrease when the stator winding is heating up and the pressure growth when the stator winding gets cools [3].

This was confirmed by the measurements on the full-scale model of the 200 MW turbo-genera-tor’s stator. The calculated distribution of thermo-mechanical strains (z) along the tooth end zone when heating up the winding bar is shown on the figure 2 for the wide range of mechanical parameters.

The measurement results are presented in the same diagram. The pressure decrease varied from 0,1 to 0,5 MPa. The local pressure decrease shows up the most when the winding fastening in slots is the tightest and winding fastening in the winding ends is the lightest in the axial direction. The winding copper temperature decrease below 30° C when the core is heated has the negative effect on the teeth ends pressure.

The effect of the rigidity of elastic joints between the stator core and the keybars on axial strains of the keybars was examined on the stator of 220 MW turbo-generator when unscrewing the keybar ends tensioning nuts. The measured axial strains εp were non-uniformly distributed along the keybar showing the significant decrease from end to middle.

The figure 3 presents the calculated values of relative deformations εp(x)/εp(0) and the measurements where x is the distance from the keybar end. The calculated values corresponding to greater of rigidity levels of elastic joints between the stator core and the keybars are in good concordance with measurement results [4].

The satisfactory variance between calculated and experimental results indicates the discussed model could be used on practice for example for choosing the optimal fastening characteristics of stator elements or validating the specific heating conditions of turbo-generator.

References

  1. F.R. Gantmacher. The Theory of Matrices. — AMS Chelsea Publishing: Reprinted by American Mathematical Society, 2000.
  2. J.H.Wilkinson, C.Reinsch. Handbook for Automatic Computation Linear Algebra. Heidelberg New York, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany, 1971.
  3. G.G.Schastlivy, O.S.Golodnova, G.M.Fedorenko, E.P.Firsanov/ The development of integrated approach to theoretical analysis of thermo-mechanical processes in turbo-generator stator components. Kiev. Institute of Electrodynamics of Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. Preprint 559.1988 (In Russian).
  4. E.P.Firsanov. The modeling and computations of thermo-mechanical processes in turbo-generator stator components. Abstract of Ph.D.thesis. Kiev. Institute of Electrodynamics of Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. 1992 (In Russian).

 

 

The author: E.P. Firsanov

The translator – M.V.Maksimov

 

 

Publishing date: February 6, 2012
Source: SciTecLibrary.ru

Back

 

Copyright © SciTecLibrary


To add the material   Terms of registration   Terms for placing technology, inventions, productions & other informations   Price list




Rambler's Top100 Rambler's Top100 ßíäåêñ öèòèðîâàíèÿ