| ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS ON ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS |
| The erroneous physical theories have produced many errors in the interpretation of the astronomical phenomena and processes. Let us demonstrate in what way the new theory of microworld destroys the astrophysical card-castles of “the Big Bang”, “black holes”, “the expanding universe”, “dark matter” and other astrophysical myths. |
|
| THE NEXT ERROR COMMITTED BY THE NOBEL COMMITTEE |
| We shall demonstrate a gist of impropriety of the scientific result, for which the 2011 Nobel Prize in physics has been awarded. In order to expedite an apprehension of the essence of the error, let us make our representation in the form of the answers to the questions. |
|
| IS SCIENTIFIC TRUTH BORN OF AGRUMENTS? |
| A philosophical statement “Truth is born of arguments” is one of the greatest misconceptions of the scientific truth searchers. Each of them thinks that only he is right. But there is only one truth |
|
| WHAT IS LIFE? |
| In this article we suggest a principally new (and simultaneously a very simple) answer - which naturally follows from fundamental physical laws - to the eternal human question about the essence of the phenomenon of life. |
|
| THE PROBLEM OF INTERPRETATION OF SACRED SCRIPTURES AND THE CONFLICT OF ISLAMIST FUNDAMENTALISM AND THE WEST |
| The problem of interpretation of Scriptures connects not only to the conflict of Islamic fundamentalism and the West, but much broader - to understanding between people of different religions, different denominations, and even believers and atheists. But, of course, the conflict between Islamic fundamentalism and the West, accompanied by terror and the threat of global nuclear war, is the most important. And because of its importance and the danger to humanity the media and academic writings have already spent a lot of words to explain his reasons and to offer the recommendations to overcome them. |
|
| THE PROBLEM OF JUSTIFYING MORALITY |
| The question of why a person should adhere to the norms of morality (if you must) and what exactly the rules troubled mankind and philosophers, in particular, for a long time. Ancient philosophers, especially Socrates, Plato and Aristotle many addressed at the topic. They tried to justify morality on reason and in this sense, their justifying, or rather attempts to justify, may be named attempts to rational justification. However, despite the fact that their intention was good, it was doomed to fail as a rational science then just took his first steps and it’s method itself was not yet observed in the air. |
|
| MODERN PHILANTROPY (Open letter to G. Soros) |
| In addition, this method, even at the level of stereotype of scientific thought, exists today only in the natural sciences themselves. Humanities still did not know it at all. The natural sciences due to possessing of the unified method have evolved: some hypotheses are taking by the entire scientific community as a proven theory, and some, also by the whole community, knocking. |
|
| ABSOLUTENESS OR RELATIVITY OF SCIENTIFIC COGNITION |
| There is considered phenomena of science, which gave birth to the problem, which the analytics (the logic positivists) tried unsuccessfully to overcome, and which the post positivists used for substantiating their conclusions about relativity of scientific cognition. The general method of substantiation, which rational science uses to substantiate its theories, is expounded. On the basis of this method, rational explanation of the above phenomena is given, and argumentation of the post positivists is refuted. |
|
| ABOUT EINSTEIN’S MISTAKES IN APPREHENSION OF THE UNIVERSE DEVELOPMENT NATURE LAWS |
| Australian magazine «New Scientist» published an interesting information about Australian astrophysicist John Webb who discovered a fact that requires a revision of the modern astrophysics basics - Einstein´s relativity theory [1]. Thus, A. Rykov wrote, that «much in the Einstein´s theory and also modern theoretical astrophysics can be understood by a clear mind. Even Einstein pointed out that peculiarity of the modern astrophysics» [2]. |
|
| THE GLOBAL CRISIS OF HUMANITY AND THE SCIENTIFIC TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS |
| The fact that the scientific and technological progress is not necessarily good, I have written more than once . Here I want to consider, anyone, as far as I know, is not considered until now, a negative relationship between the scientific and technological progress and crises. |
|
Philosofy
